The post Outdated algorithm caused $650M excess losses on Hyperliquid, report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Two months on from October 10’s crypto market meltdown, which saw $19 billion of positions liquidated, Gauntlet CEO Tarun Chitra argues that common autodeleveraging (ADL) mechanisms led to massive losses on Hyperliquid. In a lengthy post to X, Chitra says an excess of $650 million was autodeleveraged from profitable traders’ positions. The amount, he claims, was 28x more than the potential bad debt facing the exchanges who used ADL. This “massacre of the innocent” could allegedly be avoided with new ADL algorithms, described in an accompanying 95-page report. Did @HyperliquidX autodeleverage (ADL) $650m of PNL that it didn’t have to? Was this 28x more than the minimal necessary? Did almost every exchange (incl. @binance) copy-pasta a Huobi heuristic from 2015? Can we do better in 2026? 𝐘𝐞𝐬 (+ a new paper) https://t.co/XNeohPg1pN — Tarun Chitra (@tarunchitra) December 9, 2025 Read more: How Binance’s USDe ‘depeg’ cost the exchange millions Autodeleveraging on autopilot Chitra describes ADL as a “last resort” which applies a “haircut” to profitable traders to “cover the bad debt of insolvent positions.”  The 10-year-old “Queue” algorithm is widely used by perpetual futures platforms such as Binance, Hyperliquid, and Lighter. However, under extreme market conditions, when ADL is activated repeatedly, “the greedy Queue strategy completely fails.” The strategy assigns “haircuts” as a function of profits and leverage which, Chitra says, concentrates losses on the biggest winners, while overshooting the necessary amount to be liquidated. He suggests a “risk-aware pro-rata” algorithm which assigns ADL based on the leverage of each position. The post recognizes that “a perfect [ADL] strategy does not exist.” However, optimizing for three elements of a so-called ADL Trillema (solvency, fairness and revenue), and running on October 10 Hyperliquid data, the new approach appears to significantly outperform Queue. Chitra ends by urging for further innovation in the… The post Outdated algorithm caused $650M excess losses on Hyperliquid, report appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Two months on from October 10’s crypto market meltdown, which saw $19 billion of positions liquidated, Gauntlet CEO Tarun Chitra argues that common autodeleveraging (ADL) mechanisms led to massive losses on Hyperliquid. In a lengthy post to X, Chitra says an excess of $650 million was autodeleveraged from profitable traders’ positions. The amount, he claims, was 28x more than the potential bad debt facing the exchanges who used ADL. This “massacre of the innocent” could allegedly be avoided with new ADL algorithms, described in an accompanying 95-page report. Did @HyperliquidX autodeleverage (ADL) $650m of PNL that it didn’t have to? Was this 28x more than the minimal necessary? Did almost every exchange (incl. @binance) copy-pasta a Huobi heuristic from 2015? Can we do better in 2026? 𝐘𝐞𝐬 (+ a new paper) https://t.co/XNeohPg1pN — Tarun Chitra (@tarunchitra) December 9, 2025 Read more: How Binance’s USDe ‘depeg’ cost the exchange millions Autodeleveraging on autopilot Chitra describes ADL as a “last resort” which applies a “haircut” to profitable traders to “cover the bad debt of insolvent positions.”  The 10-year-old “Queue” algorithm is widely used by perpetual futures platforms such as Binance, Hyperliquid, and Lighter. However, under extreme market conditions, when ADL is activated repeatedly, “the greedy Queue strategy completely fails.” The strategy assigns “haircuts” as a function of profits and leverage which, Chitra says, concentrates losses on the biggest winners, while overshooting the necessary amount to be liquidated. He suggests a “risk-aware pro-rata” algorithm which assigns ADL based on the leverage of each position. The post recognizes that “a perfect [ADL] strategy does not exist.” However, optimizing for three elements of a so-called ADL Trillema (solvency, fairness and revenue), and running on October 10 Hyperliquid data, the new approach appears to significantly outperform Queue. Chitra ends by urging for further innovation in the…

Outdated algorithm caused $650M excess losses on Hyperliquid, report

Two months on from October 10’s crypto market meltdown, which saw $19 billion of positions liquidated, Gauntlet CEO Tarun Chitra argues that common autodeleveraging (ADL) mechanisms led to massive losses on Hyperliquid.

In a lengthy post to X, Chitra says an excess of $650 million was autodeleveraged from profitable traders’ positions. The amount, he claims, was 28x more than the potential bad debt facing the exchanges who used ADL.

This “massacre of the innocent” could allegedly be avoided with new ADL algorithms, described in an accompanying 95-page report.

Read more: How Binance’s USDe ‘depeg’ cost the exchange millions

Autodeleveraging on autopilot

Chitra describes ADL as a “last resort” which applies a “haircut” to profitable traders to “cover the bad debt of insolvent positions.” 

The 10-year-old “Queue” algorithm is widely used by perpetual futures platforms such as Binance, Hyperliquid, and Lighter.

However, under extreme market conditions, when ADL is activated repeatedly, “the greedy Queue strategy completely fails.”

The strategy assigns “haircuts” as a function of profits and leverage which, Chitra says, concentrates losses on the biggest winners, while overshooting the necessary amount to be liquidated.

He suggests a “risk-aware pro-rata” algorithm which assigns ADL based on the leverage of each position.

The post recognizes that “a perfect [ADL] strategy does not exist.” However, optimizing for three elements of a so-called ADL Trillema (solvency, fairness and revenue), and running on October 10 Hyperliquid data, the new approach appears to significantly outperform Queue.

Chitra ends by urging for further innovation in the design of algorithmic clearing: “ADL was invented as a band-aid in 2015. We haven’t even begun to explore the design space!

Read more: Aster vs Hyperliquid: inside the high-stakes perp DEX war

Hyperlivid

In response to Chitra’s post, Hyperliquid’s Jeff Yan quipped, “Those who can, do. Those who can’t, fud.” 

However, rather than responding directly to the claims of inefficient autodeleveraging, he takes issue with the description of the relationship between ADL and Hyperliquid’s HLP insurance fund.

He accused Chitra of “spread[ing] lies masked by fancy ML terms to sound smart.”

Other Hyperliquid supporters pitched in, pointing to apparent inaccuracies and bias due to investments in competitors.

Read more: ZKasino exploiter saw $27M liquidated on Hyperliquid trade

In the wake of the October 10 crash, Yan argued that “ADLs net made users hundreds of millions of dollars by closing profitable short positions at favorable prices.”

He highlighted that the platform’s ADL queue incorporates “both leverage used and unrealized pnl,” while thanking users for feedback. He also alluded to research “on whether there can be substantial improvements that merit more complexity.”

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/outdated-algorithm-caused-650m-excess-losses-on-hyperliquid-report/

Piyasa Fırsatı
Common Protocol Logosu
Common Protocol Fiyatı(COMMON)
$0.003048
$0.003048$0.003048
-2.11%
USD
Common Protocol (COMMON) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Paylaş
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Paylaş
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26