Foxconn’s two-year effort to acquire a major stake in a key unit of German auto supplier ZF Group has hit a wall after due diligence conducted by its advisor, JPMorgan, revealed a wide valuation gap and a higher-than-expected debt. Per documents reviewed by Reuters, Foxconn’s due diligence concluded that ZF’s powertrain technology division, known internally […]Foxconn’s two-year effort to acquire a major stake in a key unit of German auto supplier ZF Group has hit a wall after due diligence conducted by its advisor, JPMorgan, revealed a wide valuation gap and a higher-than-expected debt. Per documents reviewed by Reuters, Foxconn’s due diligence concluded that ZF’s powertrain technology division, known internally […]

Foxconn’s bid for ZF stake stalls after due diligence reveals debt, valuation gap

2025/10/15 23:30

Foxconn’s two-year effort to acquire a major stake in a key unit of German auto supplier ZF Group has hit a wall after due diligence conducted by its advisor, JPMorgan, revealed a wide valuation gap and a higher-than-expected debt.

Per documents reviewed by Reuters, Foxconn’s due diligence concluded that ZF’s powertrain technology division, known internally as Division E, was worth between $1.74 billion and €2.5 billion, far below the $2.9 billion figure previously discussed. 

More strikingly, the unit’s equity value was found to be negative, compared with an earlier estimate of $1.5 billion. A comment in the internal materials reportedly read: “No deal if equity value is negative.”

Debt burden and valuation mismatch

The due diligence uncovered that Division E’s net debt was almost 90% higher than expected, reaching $4.9 billion, according to the JPMorgan document titled Project Verde – Discussion Materials. A significant portion of that debt, nearly $1.1 billion, reportedly came from previously underestimated pension liabilities. 

Foxconn and ZF had been exploring a potential investment under which the Taiwanese company would inject around $1.5 billion to buy a stake in the division if its equity valuation reached $3 billion, a structure outlined in a ZF document dated February 2025.

According to the findings, ZF has been struggling under a heavy debt load from past acquisitions. 

Foxconn’s EV ambitions tested

Foxconn, formally known as Hon Hai Precision Industry, has been trying to replicate its success in electronics manufacturing in the automotive world. The company has identified electric vehicles as a pillar of future growth and wants to capture a sizeable part of the global EV market.

Foxconn has launched several ventures to anchor itself in the EV ecosystem, but progress has been uneven. In July, Foxconn sold a former factory in the U.S. that it initially acquired in 2022 for EV production. Also, its partnership with China’s Geely to provide contract manufacturing has shown little movement. 

Nonetheless, Foxconn continues to push forward through partnerships in Asia.

However, in May, it signed a memorandum of understanding with Mitsubishi Motors through its subsidiary Foxtron Vehicle Technologies to develop and supply an electric model to be built by Taiwan’s Yulon Motor and launched in Oceania in 2026. It also struck an agreement with Mitsubishi Fuso in August to collaborate on zero-emission buses.

Last year, Foxconn reportedly acquired 50% shares in ZF Chassis Modules, the ZF Group’s chassis systems maker for passenger cars.

However, the stalled ZF transaction is a setback in the company’s effort to secure a strong foothold in Europe’s automotive supply chain.

New direction for ZF and industry pressures

While the equity sale may be off the table, ZF is reportedly still in talks with Foxconn and other potential partners about possible partnerships that are focused on specific technologies within Division E.

The difficulties encountered in the Foxconn negotiations highlight a major strain across Europe’s automotive supply industry, where suppliers face heavy investment needs to transition from combustion technology to electrification, thanks to emissions rules they have to comply with. 

Many are also grappling with legacy costs, including pensions and restructuring charges, that complicate their capital strategies, as seen in the case of ZF.

The latest findings are quite damning for ZF, and it has raised questions about its ability to manage leverage, as its high debt levels could constrain future investment and make asset sales harder to execute without major discounts.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Piyasa Fırsatı
CreatorBid Logosu
CreatorBid Fiyatı(BID)
$0.02828
$0.02828$0.02828
-1.66%
USD
CreatorBid (BID) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

PaaS leader ensures seamless migrations and uninterrupted payment operations LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Volante Technologies, the global leader in Payments as a Service
Paylaş
AI Journal2025/12/16 17:16
Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Paylaş
PANews2025/09/18 07:00