A single mistyped command erased Toy Story 2 from existence in 1998. Pixar's backup system had quietly failed weeks earlier. Backup from a mother's laptop allowed the team to recover nearly everything that was lost.A single mistyped command erased Toy Story 2 from existence in 1998. Pixar's backup system had quietly failed weeks earlier. Backup from a mother's laptop allowed the team to recover nearly everything that was lost.

To Infinity… and Delete

2025/10/30 04:34

In 1998, disaster struck at Pixar. A single mistyped command — rm -rf / — began erasing Toy Story 2 from existence. Character by character, scene by scene, the movie that had taken a year to build vanished in seconds. The team watched in disbelief as Woody’s hat, Buzz’s wings, and entire sets disappeared before their eyes. When engineers rushed to restore from backups, they discovered something worse — the backup system had quietly failed weeks earlier. As IT professionals, we have all been there before, but what can we learn from this and get Buzz to his ship on time?

Andy’s Party

This “Core memory” took place in 1998, with Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull remembering it in his book called “Creativity, Inc.”. The story begins with an unfortunate, unnamed Pixar employee who was doing some routine file clearance on internal servers when they accidentally entered a deletion command on Toy Story 2's root folder…That’s some good news. This “Updating your resume event” resulted in character models and assets disappearing, and the file servers were quickly shut down.

\ Unfortunately, by that point, around 90% of the work done on Toy Story 2 was gone, and the sequel's backup system was not working properly for around a month either. At this point, Toy Story 2 would either have to start from scratch - or production would be scrapped altogether.

A Mother Saves the Day

A mother saves the day, just like when Buzz and Woody team up to get home. Galyn Susman, the film’s technical direction supervisor, who would be affected by Disney’s layoffs in 2023, had a copy of the Toy Story project at home. Galyn was on maternity leave and decided to continue working from home – something that is seen as normal today - but at the time, taboo. Being a mother and always planning ahead, just like having children, made it a point to take her work home once a week. This was a huge benefit because it allowed her to stay updated and maintain a reliable backup of Toy Story 2.

\ Just like a newborn baby, Pixar carefully transported the laptop back to the office, cradled and wrapped in blankets during the car ride - I imagine they even played lullaby music for the laptop…or maybe that is something I would do. Having the backup from Susman’s laptop allowed the team to copy the files and recover nearly everything that had been lost.

\ It was a joyous occasion with many high fives, and maybe put a smile on the face of the person responsible for the deletion. Susman’s backup copy didn’t have the entire movie on her computer, but they were able to retrieve enough to complete and deliver Toy Story 2 on time. Queue the inspirational music and dance like nobody is watching. What a story, right?

\ What about the employee who deleted the files? I am glad you are paying attention. So far, there are no reports of them being fired or facing consequences. I will say it’s easy to imagine the tension at the time, and maybe a future project with them working on the backup process.

Lessons Learned

The experience serves as a valuable lesson, not just for the Pixar folks but for IT professionals worldwide. There is a strong commitment to create multiple backups and implement extra security measures to prevent such incidents from happening again.

\ In this story, the backup system had failed months earlier, and nobody noticed. That meant there weren’t any backups to restore from, and business was at a standstill. Does that sound familiar to today’s events? It should because it happens a lot these days. What can businesses do to keep safe from this disaster?

Backups

  • The 3-2-1 rule - data backup rule is a strategy that recommends keeping three copies of your data, on two different types of storage media, with one copy stored offsite. This method ensures redundancy and protects data from a single point of failure, such as hardware failure, theft, or a local disaster.

    \

  • Offsite backups - An offsite, air-gapped data backup stores a copy of your data in a separate physical or cloud location (offsite) and keeps it disconnected from your primary network (air-gapped). This combination protects your data from localized disasters and cyber threats like ransomware, which cannot remotely access or corrupt the air-gapped backup copy.

    \

  • RPO & RTO - Recovery Point Objective and Recovery Time Objective. It’s not just important, but vital to your business continuity and survival in the event of a disaster. Most businesses state that they have backups tested and that pass the audits, but when they have to restore their systems when a disaster happens, it takes a lot longer than they had planned, and the business loses money because of it.

Technical Controls and Permissions: Restricted Folder Deletion Privileges.

  • The simplest prevention would have been to set permissions on the server so that not all employees could delete the top-level directory for the movie. Granting "full control" access to a large group of users is common in collaborative environments, but it is a major security risk. Only a small number of administrators should have the permission to run "delete" commands on critical, high-level folders.

\

  • Command-level restrictions. The employee used the rm -r Linux command, which deletes a directory and all its contents recursively. A more advanced system could have prevented this command from running at the highest project directory level, either with a special script or by requiring a second authentication step.

    \

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
Share
PANews2025/10/30 14:00