The post Silicon limitations, new material innovations in BTC mining appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Tech > Silicon limitations, new material innovations in BTC mining A change is occurring in BTC mining, where efficiency is very important. The industry has benefited from Moore’s Law for years, which predicted transistor density would double every few years, leading to faster and cheaper chips. However, as we reach the 3-5 nanometer (nm) node in 2025, progress is slowing. The once-rapid performance gains are decreasing, causing miners and manufacturers to alter their plans. This has resulted in a shift to new materials such as carbon nanotubes and a greater focus on energy use as the pattern of constant innovation slows. This may change how BTC is mined, balancing power with sustainability in a competitive market. BTC mining depends on application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), custom chips that perform complex calculations that protect the network. In the past, there was fast progress from large, energy-consuming setups to machines that produced more hashes per watt. By 2025, top ASICs, such as Bitmain‘s Antminer series or MicroBT’s Whatsminers, have efficiencies of about 15-20 joules per terahash (J/TH), which is much better than the 100+ J/TH of older models. Still, the rate of improvement is falling. The efficiency boosts from generation to generation, which used to be 50-100%, are now only 20-30% as we get closer to the limits of silicon-based transistors. The reason for the slowdown is that at 3-5nm, quantum effects, such as electron tunneling, cause problems. This leads to leakage and heat issues that reduce performance gains. Also, making these tiny features is very expensive, costing billions in research and development for foundries like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NASDAQ: TSM) or Samsung. For BTC miners, this means lower returns. The latest 3nm chips from companies like Block (formerly Square) only offer small improvements over 5nm chips, and the… The post Silicon limitations, new material innovations in BTC mining appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Tech > Silicon limitations, new material innovations in BTC mining A change is occurring in BTC mining, where efficiency is very important. The industry has benefited from Moore’s Law for years, which predicted transistor density would double every few years, leading to faster and cheaper chips. However, as we reach the 3-5 nanometer (nm) node in 2025, progress is slowing. The once-rapid performance gains are decreasing, causing miners and manufacturers to alter their plans. This has resulted in a shift to new materials such as carbon nanotubes and a greater focus on energy use as the pattern of constant innovation slows. This may change how BTC is mined, balancing power with sustainability in a competitive market. BTC mining depends on application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), custom chips that perform complex calculations that protect the network. In the past, there was fast progress from large, energy-consuming setups to machines that produced more hashes per watt. By 2025, top ASICs, such as Bitmain‘s Antminer series or MicroBT’s Whatsminers, have efficiencies of about 15-20 joules per terahash (J/TH), which is much better than the 100+ J/TH of older models. Still, the rate of improvement is falling. The efficiency boosts from generation to generation, which used to be 50-100%, are now only 20-30% as we get closer to the limits of silicon-based transistors. The reason for the slowdown is that at 3-5nm, quantum effects, such as electron tunneling, cause problems. This leads to leakage and heat issues that reduce performance gains. Also, making these tiny features is very expensive, costing billions in research and development for foundries like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NASDAQ: TSM) or Samsung. For BTC miners, this means lower returns. The latest 3nm chips from companies like Block (formerly Square) only offer small improvements over 5nm chips, and the…

Silicon limitations, new material innovations in BTC mining

2025/10/29 16:14

A change is occurring in BTC mining, where efficiency is very important. The industry has benefited from Moore’s Law for years, which predicted transistor density would double every few years, leading to faster and cheaper chips. However, as we reach the 3-5 nanometer (nm) node in 2025, progress is slowing. The once-rapid performance gains are decreasing, causing miners and manufacturers to alter their plans.

This has resulted in a shift to new materials such as carbon nanotubes and a greater focus on energy use as the pattern of constant innovation slows. This may change how BTC is mined, balancing power with sustainability in a competitive market.

BTC mining depends on application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), custom chips that perform complex calculations that protect the network. In the past, there was fast progress from large, energy-consuming setups to machines that produced more hashes per watt. By 2025, top ASICs, such as Bitmain‘s Antminer series or MicroBT’s Whatsminers, have efficiencies of about 15-20 joules per terahash (J/TH), which is much better than the 100+ J/TH of older models. Still, the rate of improvement is falling. The efficiency boosts from generation to generation, which used to be 50-100%, are now only 20-30% as we get closer to the limits of silicon-based transistors.

The reason for the slowdown is that at 3-5nm, quantum effects, such as electron tunneling, cause problems. This leads to leakage and heat issues that reduce performance gains. Also, making these tiny features is very expensive, costing billions in research and development for foundries like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NASDAQ: TSM) or Samsung.

For BTC miners, this means lower returns. The latest 3nm chips from companies like Block (formerly Square) only offer small improvements over 5nm chips, and the energy savings don’t make up for rising electricity costs. In fact, the increase in global hashrate has been slower in 2025 because smaller companies can’t justify upgrading hardware due to reduced profitability. Models like the Antminer S19 are nearly unprofitable, especially with power prices above $0.05 per kWh.

This stagnation is both technical and economic. The BTC halving in April 2024 cut block rewards in half, increasing competition and pushing miners to merge. Public companies like MARA (NASDAQ: MARA) and Bitdeer (NASDAQ: BTDR) are growing their fleets to 75 EH/s or more, but they are using hardware that isn’t improving as fast as the network requires.

Experts say that the block reward mining hardware market is expected to reach $51.8 billion by 2030, but growth is now more about size and making small efficiency improvements instead of making revolutionary chip changes. Home miners, who used to be helped by accessible ASICs, are also struggling. Some call for chip independence to make access more equal through modular designs.

The industry needs to move beyond silicon’s limitations. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are becoming popular because they offer smaller, faster, and more energy-efficient transistors. These cylindrical structures, made of rolled-up graphene sheets, conduct electricity with very little resistance and can work at sizes below 1nm without the quantum problems that affect silicon. Chinese researchers have already created CNT-based AI chips that are 1,700 times more efficient than silicon chips for certain tasks. If used in BTC mining, CNTs could greatly lower power use. This would allow for denser, cooler ASICs, possibly reducing efficiencies to below 5 J/TH by late 2025.

CNTs aren’t the only option. Other materials, like gallium nitride or 2D substances like molybdenum disulfide, are being studied because they have better electron mobility. Also, there is a growing focus on energy-related changes, such as immersion cooling, AI-improved rig management, and hybrid setups that reuse mining heat for homes or data centers. Companies like Canaan (NASDAQ: CAN) are investing in these integrations, believing that the next big efficiency gains will come from complete system designs, not just smaller nodes.

Recycling CNTs is also showing potential, with discoveries that allow full reuse of nanotube fibers, which addresses environmental worries in an industry that is often criticized for e-waste.

These new ideas could keep Moore’s Law alive in some way. For BTC miners, this means a more sustainable future with lower costs, smaller carbon footprints, and protection from regulations on energy use. There are still challenges, such as scaling CNT production. Purity and alignment problems are still stopping widespread use. Geopolitical issues, such as the competition between the U.S. and China in the chip market, could also slow global implementation.

The current slowdown marks a critical juncture for BTC mining hardware. The industry must move beyond its reliance on shrinking silicon by investigating novel materials and more intelligent energy solutions. By 2025, success in this shifting landscape will go to those who adapt, from big firms aiming for exahash to hobbyists building advanced systems.

Watch | Mining Disrupt 2025 Highlights: Profitable trends every miner should know

title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen=””>

Source: https://coingeek.com/silicon-limitations-new-material-innovations-in-btc-mining/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
Share
PANews2025/10/30 14:00