A landmark rule change effectively creating a "fast-track" for new digital asset ETPs to come to market without the traditional, individualized SEC review process has been approved.A landmark rule change effectively creating a "fast-track" for new digital asset ETPs to come to market without the traditional, individualized SEC review process has been approved.

SEC Greenlights "Fast-Track" for Digital Asset ETPs; Crenshaw Cries Foul

2025/09/18 11:00

SEC Greenlights "Fast-Track" for Digital Asset ETPs; Crenshaw Cries Foul

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved a landmark rule change that will allow exchanges to adopt generic listing standards for certain exchange-traded products (ETPs), including those holding digital assets. This move effectively creates a "fast-track" for new digital asset ETPs to come to market without the traditional, individualized SEC review process, which has been a major hurdle for the industry.

While undoubtedly hailed as a significant regulatory breakthrough by those in the digital asset space, the decision has drawn sharp criticism from no less than SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw herself. Commissioner Crenshaw, in a dissenting statement, expressed concern that the SEC is "passing the buck" on its responsibility to protect investors by fast-tracking what she considers to be nascent and unproven products.

A Breakthrough Years in the Making

This new rule represents a major inflection point for digital assets, which have historically faced a long and arduous path to gaining regulatory approval in the U.S. The SEC has a long history of delaying or denying applications for digital asset ETPs, particularly those holding spot cryptocurrencies. For example, the first spot Bitcoin ETF application was filed in 2013, but it took until January 2024, and a landmark court ruling, for the first one to be approved. Similarly, approvals for other spot crypto ETFs were also subject to multiple delays, often taking the maximum 240 days for a decision.

The generic listing standard is a game-changer because it mirrors a framework that has been successful for other asset classes. In 2019, the SEC adopted a similar rule, known as the "ETF Rule," which dramatically streamlined the approval process for traditional stock and bond ETFs. This new digital asset ETP rule is expected to have a similar effect, allowing for a wave of new products to enter the market more quickly and efficiently.

Who Wins?

This new framework is poised to benefit a wide range of digital assets beyond just Bitcoin and Ethereum, which were the first to receive spot ETP approvals in 2024. Firms that have filed for ETPs tied to cryptocurrencies such as Solana (SOL), XRP (XRP), Dogecoin (DOGE), and Cardano (ADA) are now in a prime position to see their products listed.

The fast-track process will significantly reduce the time it takes for these products to go from filing to trading. Instead of the lengthy, bespoke review that could take months or even years, qualifying digital asset ETPs will now be able to list if they meet the new generic standards. This change is expected to open the door to a more diverse crypto ETP market, including potential index funds and baskets of cryptocurrencies.

ETPs ≠ ETFs

Despite the excitement, Commissioner Crenshaw's statement highlights a significant concern: the potential for investor confusion. She points out that while all ETFs are ETPs, not all ETPs are ETFs. ETPs approved under the new framework are governed by the Securities Act of 1933, which offers fewer investor protections than the Investment Company Act of 1940 that governs ETFs.

The 1940 Act provides protections related to independent board oversight, conflicts of interest, and regular SEC examinations, which are not required for ETPs under the 1933 Act. Crenshaw warns that investors may incorrectly assume they have the same level of protection for these new digital asset ETPs as they do for traditional ETFs, which she believes is "legally incorrect and practically dangerous."

➢ Stay ahead of the curve. Join Blockhead on Telegram today for all the latest in crypto.
+ Follow Blockhead on Google News

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Disney Pockets $2.2 Billion For Filming Outside America

Disney Pockets $2.2 Billion For Filming Outside America

The post Disney Pockets $2.2 Billion For Filming Outside America appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Disney has made $2.2 billion from filming productions like ‘Avengers: Endgame’ in the U.K. ©Marvel Studios 2018 Disney has been handed $2.2 billion by the government of the United Kingdom over the past 15 years in return for filming movies and streaming shows in the country according to analysis of more than 400 company filings Disney is believed to be the biggest single beneficiary of the Audio-Visual Expenditure Credit (AVEC) in the U.K. which gives studios a cash reimbursement of up to 25.5% of the money they spend there. The generous fiscal incentives have attracted all of the major Hollywood studios to the U.K. and the country has reeled in the returns from it. Data from the British Film Institute (BFI) shows that foreign studios contributed around 87% of the $2.2 billion (£1.6 billion) spent on making films in the U.K. last year. It is a 7.6% increase on the sum spent in 2019 and is in stark contrast to the picture in the United States. According to permit issuing office FilmLA, the number of on-location shooting days in Los Angeles fell 35.7% from 2019 to 2024 making it the second-least productive year since 1995 aside from 2020 when it was the height of the pandemic. The outlook hasn’t improved since then with FilmLA’s latest data showing that between April and June this year there was a 6.2% drop in shooting days on the same period a year ago. It followed a 22.4% decline in the first quarter with FilmLA noting that “each drop reflected the impact of global production cutbacks and California’s ongoing loss of work to rival territories.” The one-two punch of the pandemic followed by the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strikes put Hollywood on the ropes just as the U.K. began drafting a plan to improve its fiscal incentives…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:20