The post Injective (INJ) completes its first community buyback worth $32 million appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The L1 project burns over 6.7M tokens in its first community buyback. The initiative aims to reward active network participants. Another buyback is slated for November, strengthening Injective’s deflationary mechanism. Injective has taken it to X to confirm the completion of its first community-led token buyback, which started on October 23, marking a key step in the L1’s deflationary model. The team revealed that the event burned 6.78 million INJ coins, worth roughly $32.28 million. The first $INJ Community BuyBack is now officially complete! Injective is the only chain where token buybacks directly reward the community. 1. INJ is burned forever2. The community earns from a reward pool for their contributions Stay tuned for the next burn in November 🔥 pic.twitter.com/5KUiMDiyaI — Injective 🥷 (@injective) October 29, 2025 The strategic initiative sets Injective apart from most blockchain projects, making asset buybacks a community-driven event. Rather than the foundation or team repurchasing tokens and burning them privately, Injective prioritizes user participation. The layer 1 network creates a system that merges deflation with community incentives. Such an approach ensures that active network participants benefit from Injective’s ecosystem expansion, aligning rewards between INJ holders, traders, and developers. The announcement read: Injective is the only chain where token buybacks directly reward the community. Notably, Injective opened the first community buyback event for the public on October 23, with the actual repurchase and token burn occurring after a week, on October 27. Injective’s unique buyback strategy Injective’s community buyback mechanism adopts two powerful yet simple ways. First and foremost, the platform permanently burns native tokens to reduce the overall supply. Secondly, it distributes some of the value to reward users who contribute to the INJ’s ecosystem. According to the official blog: The Community BuyBack is a monthly on-chain event that allows anyone to take part… The post Injective (INJ) completes its first community buyback worth $32 million appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The L1 project burns over 6.7M tokens in its first community buyback. The initiative aims to reward active network participants. Another buyback is slated for November, strengthening Injective’s deflationary mechanism. Injective has taken it to X to confirm the completion of its first community-led token buyback, which started on October 23, marking a key step in the L1’s deflationary model. The team revealed that the event burned 6.78 million INJ coins, worth roughly $32.28 million. The first $INJ Community BuyBack is now officially complete! Injective is the only chain where token buybacks directly reward the community. 1. INJ is burned forever2. The community earns from a reward pool for their contributions Stay tuned for the next burn in November 🔥 pic.twitter.com/5KUiMDiyaI — Injective 🥷 (@injective) October 29, 2025 The strategic initiative sets Injective apart from most blockchain projects, making asset buybacks a community-driven event. Rather than the foundation or team repurchasing tokens and burning them privately, Injective prioritizes user participation. The layer 1 network creates a system that merges deflation with community incentives. Such an approach ensures that active network participants benefit from Injective’s ecosystem expansion, aligning rewards between INJ holders, traders, and developers. The announcement read: Injective is the only chain where token buybacks directly reward the community. Notably, Injective opened the first community buyback event for the public on October 23, with the actual repurchase and token burn occurring after a week, on October 27. Injective’s unique buyback strategy Injective’s community buyback mechanism adopts two powerful yet simple ways. First and foremost, the platform permanently burns native tokens to reduce the overall supply. Secondly, it distributes some of the value to reward users who contribute to the INJ’s ecosystem. According to the official blog: The Community BuyBack is a monthly on-chain event that allows anyone to take part…

Injective (INJ) completes its first community buyback worth $32 million

2025/10/30 03:16
  • The L1 project burns over 6.7M tokens in its first community buyback.
  • The initiative aims to reward active network participants.
  • Another buyback is slated for November, strengthening Injective’s deflationary mechanism.

Injective has taken it to X to confirm the completion of its first community-led token buyback, which started on October 23, marking a key step in the L1’s deflationary model.

The team revealed that the event burned 6.78 million INJ coins, worth roughly $32.28 million.

The strategic initiative sets Injective apart from most blockchain projects, making asset buybacks a community-driven event.

Rather than the foundation or team repurchasing tokens and burning them privately, Injective prioritizes user participation.

The layer 1 network creates a system that merges deflation with community incentives.

Such an approach ensures that active network participants benefit from Injective’s ecosystem expansion, aligning rewards between INJ holders, traders, and developers.

The announcement read:

Notably, Injective opened the first community buyback event for the public on October 23, with the actual repurchase and token burn occurring after a week, on October 27.

Injective’s unique buyback strategy

Injective’s community buyback mechanism adopts two powerful yet simple ways.

First and foremost, the platform permanently burns native tokens to reduce the overall supply.

Secondly, it distributes some of the value to reward users who contribute to the INJ’s ecosystem.

According to the official blog:

Notably, the Community BuyBack basket comprises various tokens, including USDT and INJ, valued at 10,000 Injective tokens.

That design introduces a robust deflationary model, while incentivizing loyal users.

Injective maintains transparency, with all buyback information available on the dashboard.

Adopting a deflationary economy with a twist

Injective’s latest announcement is part of its broader mission to build a community-centered, sustainable token economy.

By burning native tokens every month, the project aims to reduce INJ inflation while encouraging long-term holding.

Most projects across the decentralized finance sector are embracing such mechanisms.

However, Injective has added a significant twist, involving its users in the process.

Besides strengthening trust, such an approach keeps INJ holders engaged in the ecosystem’s growth.

Also, holders will benefit from scarcity as every buyback reduces the circulating asset supply permanently.

The next burn will happen next month, in November.

INJ price outlook

The native token remained relatively muted over the past 24 hours, as bears moved the broader market.

INJ is trading at $8.66. It has consolidated between $9 and $8 over the previous week, gaining over 3% in that timeframe.

Its daily trading volume has increased by 17%, signaling renewed optimism, likely following the buyback announcement.

Nevertheless, broad market sentiments will influence the altcoin’s price trajectory in the coming sessions.

Source: https://coinjournal.net/news/injective-inj-completes-its-first-community-buyback-worth-32-million/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
Share
PANews2025/10/30 14:00