TLDR Grokipedia is open-source and free, with over 885,000 articles at launch. Grok AI manages all content and decides if user edit requests are accepted. Musk delayed the launch to remove what he called “propaganda” content. Wikipedia’s article on Grokipedia notes concerns of far-right slant. Elon Musk has introduced Grokipedia, an AI-driven, open-source encyclopedia aiming [...] The post Elon Musk launches Grokipedia where Grok AI controls all content appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Grokipedia is open-source and free, with over 885,000 articles at launch. Grok AI manages all content and decides if user edit requests are accepted. Musk delayed the launch to remove what he called “propaganda” content. Wikipedia’s article on Grokipedia notes concerns of far-right slant. Elon Musk has introduced Grokipedia, an AI-driven, open-source encyclopedia aiming [...] The post Elon Musk launches Grokipedia where Grok AI controls all content appeared first on CoinCentral.

Elon Musk launches Grokipedia where Grok AI controls all content

2025/10/28 16:27

TLDR

  • Grokipedia is open-source and free, with over 885,000 articles at launch.
  • Grok AI manages all content and decides if user edit requests are accepted.
  • Musk delayed the launch to remove what he called “propaganda” content.
  • Wikipedia’s article on Grokipedia notes concerns of far-right slant.

Elon Musk has introduced Grokipedia, an AI-driven, open-source encyclopedia aiming to rival Wikipedia. Unlike its counterpart, Grokipedia allows Musk’s Grok AI to take control over content moderation. Users can request edits, but the final decisions lie with the AI. This move follows Musk’s long-standing criticism of Wikipedia’s editorial process and perceived political bias, which he claims leans heavily toward left-leaning narratives.

AI Controls Editorial Decisions on Grokipedia

Elon Musk launched Grokipedia through his social media platform X. He described the platform as “truth-focused” and open for public use at no cost. Grokipedia uses Grok AI to generate and manage its content. Users can suggest changes, but the AI decides whether to accept them or not.

Musk stated, “You will be able to ask Grok to add/modify/delete articles, and it will either take the action or tell you it won’t and why.” This centralized AI moderation differs from Wikipedia’s model, which relies on thousands of human editors and automated tools. Grokipedia’s structure shifts editorial power to artificial intelligence instead of a distributed community.

Comparison Between Grokipedia and Wikipedia

Following its launch, users began comparing Grokipedia to Wikipedia. One notable example involved the article on George Floyd. On Grokipedia, the entry focused on Floyd’s criminal record. Wikipedia’s version emphasized that Floyd was killed by a white police officer.

This contrast raised concerns among critics about editorial choices. Wikipedia’s article on Grokipedia pointed out that some entries on Grokipedia “promote far-right perspectives or favor Musk’s viewpoints.” It cited examples, including the omission of a controversial hand gesture Musk made in January 2025, which Wikipedia mentioned but Grokipedia did not.

Meanwhile, Grokipedia’s article about Wikipedia includes studies claiming the site may have political bias. It says, “Studies analyzing article language and tone reveal deviations from neutrality… with right-leaning political figures and topics more frequently depicted negatively.”

Launch Delays and Technical Challenges

Grokipedia’s launch faced a short delay, which Musk attributed to a need to “purge out the propaganda.” The platform briefly crashed shortly after it went live but returned online quickly. According to Musk, Grok AI had already generated over one million articles by launch day.

At the time of release, Grokipedia claimed to host more than 885,000 articles. While the content is open-source, the AI retains full control over which content stays, changes, or gets removed. Musk did not share detailed documentation on how the AI determines factual accuracy.

Ongoing Debate Over Bias and Control

Musk has repeatedly accused Wikipedia of political bias. He has claimed its volunteer editors often shape narratives in ways that align with left-leaning ideologies. Grokipedia is presented as an answer to this problem, although some worry that it may reflect Musk’s own views instead.

The debate over Grokipedia’s neutrality is still ongoing. Critics argue that handing editorial power to AI could introduce new types of bias or overlook context. Supporters of the project argue that it might reduce human-driven agenda setting. However, both platforms now appear to be defining the direction of public information online in very different ways.

The post Elon Musk launches Grokipedia where Grok AI controls all content appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

RLUSD at Center of New Trading and Lending Alliance

RLUSD at Center of New Trading and Lending Alliance

The post RLUSD at Center of New Trading and Lending Alliance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Fintech 18 September 2025 | 15:17 Global finance took another step toward tokenisation this week as Ripple unveiled a three-way collaboration with Singapore’s DBS and U.S. asset manager Franklin Templeton. The initiative combines Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin with tokenised securities, opening up new trading and lending possibilities for large investors. Rather than focusing on crypto speculation, the project is pitched as infrastructure. Franklin Templeton will make its sgBENJI money market fund available in tokenised form, while DBS Digital Exchange will list it next to RLUSD. For the first time, institutional traders will be able to swap between a yield-bearing fund and a dollar-backed stablecoin in real time, creating a mechanism to rebalance portfolios without stepping outside the ecosystem. Why it matters This setup introduces a way for investors to toggle between safety and yield without the friction of moving funds back into traditional systems. DBS also plans to accept sgBENJI as collateral for credit lines and repo agreements, with the bank acting as custodian for pledged assets. The result could be a smoother pipeline for accessing liquidity while maintaining exposure to tokenised instruments. The strategic layer Ripple has been steadily positioning RLUSD as more than just another stablecoin. Earlier in September, the company announced plans to bring the token into African financial networks, targeting banks and enterprises in need of digital dollar liquidity. Now, with Franklin Templeton and DBS on board, RLUSD gains credibility in mainstream markets. Franklin Templeton will issue sgBENJI directly on the XRP Ledger, citing its low fees and high throughput. This move deepens the ledger’s role in hosting tokenised funds, strengthening interoperability across the ecosystem. Industry voices Executives backing the project have framed it as a turning point. DBS chief Lim Wee Kian argued that financial markets operating around the clock demand solutions designed for constant access…
Share
2025/09/18 21:32