Drake and Adin Ross are now at the center of a class-action lawsuit claiming they deceptively promoted the crypto-powered casino Stake.us. The suit was filed by Justin Killham in the Missouri county court and takes direct aim at how the platform was marketed, accusing the two of helping pull younger audiences into what the filing calls illegal gambling. The claim says Stake was operating without a license and that Drake and Ross were instrumental in drawing people in through livestreams and flashy content that blurred the lines between entertainment and gambling. Not Just Gold Coins and Games Stake reportedly labeled itself as a “social casino,” but the lawsuit says the setup was far from innocent. Players were buying what the company called “Gold Coins,” which technically had no real value. At the same time, users could access “Stake Cash,” a separate currency that could be used for real wagers and later redeemed for U.S. dollars. BREAKING: Canadian rapper Drake and online influencer Adin Ross have been sued along with sweepstakes casino website https://t.co/ZWPLa9WGvN for promoting illegal online gambling in Missouri. The class action seeks to hold Drake and Ross liable for class members' gambling losses. pic.twitter.com/YILRTAWloM — Daniel Wallach (@WALLACHLEGAL) October 27, 2025 According to the filing, this wasn’t just a clever naming trick. It claims the entire Gold Coin system was a cover for real-money gambling, with Stake Cash acting as the true currency. It argues that the games’ pricing and structure centered on Stake Cash, turning the rest of the experience into a smokescreen rather than a harmless casino simulation. Drake’s Livestreams and the Question of Real Bets The lawsuit doesn’t stop at how the platform works. It dives into how Drake and Adin Ross played into the growth of Stake’s brand, especially in the U.S. Drake is said to have made millions from these promotions, with his livestreams featuring massive bets that drew in huge audiences. But there’s a catch. The complaint suggests those jaw-dropping wagers might not have come out of his own pocket. Instead, it says the money could have been provided by Stake itself. If true, and if this was not clearly disclosed, it could violate Missouri’s gambling laws. Ross also allegedly used his massive online following to drive users to the platform while potentially gambling with house money. DISCOVER: Best New Cryptocurrencies to Invest in 2025 More Than Just Another Celebrity Crypto Case Legal observers are comparing this situation to previous lawsuits involving celebrities and failed crypto platforms, like FTX. But there’s a key difference here. The plaintiffs argue that Drake and Ross knew exactly what they were promoting and how it operated. That knowledge, if proven, could be what turns this case into something far more serious than a slap on the wrist. Market Cap 24h 7d 30d 1y All Time It also arrives at a time when U.S. regulators are starting to look more closely at how crypto blends into gambling and other high-risk online activities, especially when it involves influencers and unregulated platforms. DISCOVER: 20+ Next Crypto to Explode in 2025 Celebrities, Casinos, and a Closer Look Ahead If this case gains momentum, it could mean real consequences for both Drake and Ross. They’re accused of helping to promote an illegal gambling operation and exposing young fans to financial and emotional harm. This could also mark a turning point for how influencer-backed crypto platforms are viewed, especially those that blur legal lines. Regulators and courts are already paying attention. This lawsuit only turns up the volume. Where This Case Could Go From Here The next steps will involve how Drake, Ross, and Stake respond to the complaint. The case may reveal how Stake Cash and Gold Coins were used and any behind-the-scenes agreements. Missouri may just be the beginning. The case could shape how states regulate crypto-linked gambling and determine if influencers are liable for the platforms they promote. DISCOVER: 20+ Next Crypto to Explode in 2025  Join The 99Bitcoins News Discord Here For The Latest Market Updates Key Takeaways Drake and Adin Ross are facing a class-action lawsuit in Missouri that accuses them of promoting Stake.us, a crypto-powered casino, through deceptive marketing tactics. The lawsuit alleges that Stake used “Gold Coins” for real-money gambling, and that “Stake Cash” was the actual currency redeemable for U.S. dollars. Drake and Ross allegedly used livestreams and massive wagers to attract young audiences, with the complaint suggesting the funds may have been provided by Stake itself. Unlike past celebrity crypto cases, the filing argues that Drake and Ross knew exactly how Stake operated, making potential legal consequences more severe. The outcome of this case could set a major precedent for influencer accountability in promoting crypto-linked gambling platforms across the U.S. The post Drake and Adin Ross Face Lawsuit Over Stake Casino Promotion appeared first on 99Bitcoins.Drake and Adin Ross are now at the center of a class-action lawsuit claiming they deceptively promoted the crypto-powered casino Stake.us. The suit was filed by Justin Killham in the Missouri county court and takes direct aim at how the platform was marketed, accusing the two of helping pull younger audiences into what the filing calls illegal gambling. The claim says Stake was operating without a license and that Drake and Ross were instrumental in drawing people in through livestreams and flashy content that blurred the lines between entertainment and gambling. Not Just Gold Coins and Games Stake reportedly labeled itself as a “social casino,” but the lawsuit says the setup was far from innocent. Players were buying what the company called “Gold Coins,” which technically had no real value. At the same time, users could access “Stake Cash,” a separate currency that could be used for real wagers and later redeemed for U.S. dollars. BREAKING: Canadian rapper Drake and online influencer Adin Ross have been sued along with sweepstakes casino website https://t.co/ZWPLa9WGvN for promoting illegal online gambling in Missouri. The class action seeks to hold Drake and Ross liable for class members' gambling losses. pic.twitter.com/YILRTAWloM — Daniel Wallach (@WALLACHLEGAL) October 27, 2025 According to the filing, this wasn’t just a clever naming trick. It claims the entire Gold Coin system was a cover for real-money gambling, with Stake Cash acting as the true currency. It argues that the games’ pricing and structure centered on Stake Cash, turning the rest of the experience into a smokescreen rather than a harmless casino simulation. Drake’s Livestreams and the Question of Real Bets The lawsuit doesn’t stop at how the platform works. It dives into how Drake and Adin Ross played into the growth of Stake’s brand, especially in the U.S. Drake is said to have made millions from these promotions, with his livestreams featuring massive bets that drew in huge audiences. But there’s a catch. The complaint suggests those jaw-dropping wagers might not have come out of his own pocket. Instead, it says the money could have been provided by Stake itself. If true, and if this was not clearly disclosed, it could violate Missouri’s gambling laws. Ross also allegedly used his massive online following to drive users to the platform while potentially gambling with house money. DISCOVER: Best New Cryptocurrencies to Invest in 2025 More Than Just Another Celebrity Crypto Case Legal observers are comparing this situation to previous lawsuits involving celebrities and failed crypto platforms, like FTX. But there’s a key difference here. The plaintiffs argue that Drake and Ross knew exactly what they were promoting and how it operated. That knowledge, if proven, could be what turns this case into something far more serious than a slap on the wrist. Market Cap 24h 7d 30d 1y All Time It also arrives at a time when U.S. regulators are starting to look more closely at how crypto blends into gambling and other high-risk online activities, especially when it involves influencers and unregulated platforms. DISCOVER: 20+ Next Crypto to Explode in 2025 Celebrities, Casinos, and a Closer Look Ahead If this case gains momentum, it could mean real consequences for both Drake and Ross. They’re accused of helping to promote an illegal gambling operation and exposing young fans to financial and emotional harm. This could also mark a turning point for how influencer-backed crypto platforms are viewed, especially those that blur legal lines. Regulators and courts are already paying attention. This lawsuit only turns up the volume. Where This Case Could Go From Here The next steps will involve how Drake, Ross, and Stake respond to the complaint. The case may reveal how Stake Cash and Gold Coins were used and any behind-the-scenes agreements. Missouri may just be the beginning. The case could shape how states regulate crypto-linked gambling and determine if influencers are liable for the platforms they promote. DISCOVER: 20+ Next Crypto to Explode in 2025  Join The 99Bitcoins News Discord Here For The Latest Market Updates Key Takeaways Drake and Adin Ross are facing a class-action lawsuit in Missouri that accuses them of promoting Stake.us, a crypto-powered casino, through deceptive marketing tactics. The lawsuit alleges that Stake used “Gold Coins” for real-money gambling, and that “Stake Cash” was the actual currency redeemable for U.S. dollars. Drake and Ross allegedly used livestreams and massive wagers to attract young audiences, with the complaint suggesting the funds may have been provided by Stake itself. Unlike past celebrity crypto cases, the filing argues that Drake and Ross knew exactly how Stake operated, making potential legal consequences more severe. The outcome of this case could set a major precedent for influencer accountability in promoting crypto-linked gambling platforms across the U.S. The post Drake and Adin Ross Face Lawsuit Over Stake Casino Promotion appeared first on 99Bitcoins.

Drake and Adin Ross Face Lawsuit Over Stake Casino Promotion

2025/10/31 07:44

Drake and Adin Ross are now at the center of a class-action lawsuit claiming they deceptively promoted the crypto-powered casino Stake.us. The suit was filed by Justin Killham in the Missouri county court and takes direct aim at how the platform was marketed, accusing the two of helping pull younger audiences into what the filing calls illegal gambling. The claim says Stake was operating without a license and that Drake and Ross were instrumental in drawing people in through livestreams and flashy content that blurred the lines between entertainment and gambling.

Not Just Gold Coins and Games

Stake reportedly labeled itself as a “social casino,” but the lawsuit says the setup was far from innocent. Players were buying what the company called “Gold Coins,” which technically had no real value. At the same time, users could access “Stake Cash,” a separate currency that could be used for real wagers and later redeemed for U.S. dollars.

According to the filing, this wasn’t just a clever naming trick. It claims the entire Gold Coin system was a cover for real-money gambling, with Stake Cash acting as the true currency. It argues that the games’ pricing and structure centered on Stake Cash, turning the rest of the experience into a smokescreen rather than a harmless casino simulation.

Drake’s Livestreams and the Question of Real Bets

The lawsuit doesn’t stop at how the platform works. It dives into how Drake and Adin Ross played into the growth of Stake’s brand, especially in the U.S. Drake is said to have made millions from these promotions, with his livestreams featuring massive bets that drew in huge audiences. But there’s a catch. The complaint suggests those jaw-dropping wagers might not have come out of his own pocket.

Instead, it says the money could have been provided by Stake itself. If true, and if this was not clearly disclosed, it could violate Missouri’s gambling laws. Ross also allegedly used his massive online following to drive users to the platform while potentially gambling with house money.

DISCOVER: Best New Cryptocurrencies to Invest in 2025

More Than Just Another Celebrity Crypto Case

Legal observers are comparing this situation to previous lawsuits involving celebrities and failed crypto platforms, like FTX. But there’s a key difference here. The plaintiffs argue that Drake and Ross knew exactly what they were promoting and how it operated. That knowledge, if proven, could be what turns this case into something far more serious than a slap on the wrist.

Market Cap
24h 7d 30d 1y All Time

It also arrives at a time when U.S. regulators are starting to look more closely at how crypto blends into gambling and other high-risk online activities, especially when it involves influencers and unregulated platforms.

DISCOVER: 20+ Next Crypto to Explode in 2025

Celebrities, Casinos, and a Closer Look Ahead

If this case gains momentum, it could mean real consequences for both Drake and Ross. They’re accused of helping to promote an illegal gambling operation and exposing young fans to financial and emotional harm. This could also mark a turning point for how influencer-backed crypto platforms are viewed, especially those that blur legal lines. Regulators and courts are already paying attention. This lawsuit only turns up the volume.

Where This Case Could Go From Here

The next steps will involve how Drake, Ross, and Stake respond to the complaint. The case may reveal how Stake Cash and Gold Coins were used and any behind-the-scenes agreements. Missouri may just be the beginning. The case could shape how states regulate crypto-linked gambling and determine if influencers are liable for the platforms they promote.

DISCOVER: 20+ Next Crypto to Explode in 2025 

Join The 99Bitcoins News Discord Here For The Latest Market Updates

Key Takeaways

  • Drake and Adin Ross are facing a class-action lawsuit in Missouri that accuses them of promoting Stake.us, a crypto-powered casino, through deceptive marketing tactics.
  • The lawsuit alleges that Stake used “Gold Coins” for real-money gambling, and that “Stake Cash” was the actual currency redeemable for U.S. dollars.
  • Drake and Ross allegedly used livestreams and massive wagers to attract young audiences, with the complaint suggesting the funds may have been provided by Stake itself.
  • Unlike past celebrity crypto cases, the filing argues that Drake and Ross knew exactly how Stake operated, making potential legal consequences more severe.
  • The outcome of this case could set a major precedent for influencer accountability in promoting crypto-linked gambling platforms across the U.S.

The post Drake and Adin Ross Face Lawsuit Over Stake Casino Promotion appeared first on 99Bitcoins.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09