\ Enterprises are rapidly adopting copilots across various functions. HR has one. Finance has another. Marketing is testing its own.
\ The problem is that none of these tools connect, and all too often, IT doesn’t find out about them until after they have been embedded into workflows.
\ Does this problem sound familiar? It should. A decade ago, shadow IT spread through tools like Dropbox and Slack, which entered organizations without prior approval.
\ The difference today is that copilots do more than manage files. They sit inside sensitive workflows, influence compliance-heavy processes, and shape decisions. This raises the risks and complicates the problems.
Employees often have the best intentions when integrating a new tool into their team workflow. But unfortunately, they also create blind spots.
\ A Komprise survey revealed that 90 percent of IT leaders are concerned about shadow AI, and nearly 80 percent have already experienced negative outcomes, ranging from data leaks to reputational damage.
\ The risks are clear. A finance team’s copilot may give a different answer than HR’s. A member of the marketing team might test plugins that were never reviewed for viruses and malware. Sensitive data may be fed into copilots that lack the security safeguards enterprises expect.
\ Each of these scenarios has the potential to erode trust and expose the organization.
When copilots spread without control, four problems consistently appear:
\ These outcomes happen when well-intentioned teams adopt tools that are not designed to scale securely across an enterprise.
These problems can be avoided, but the solution starts with visibility. Leaders need a clear view of where copilots are in use. Building this inventory provides a baseline for governance.
\ Once visibility is established, the next step is to set standards. Every copilot should meet requirements for data security, privacy, and compliance.
\ I think it is important to stress that guardrails do not mean shutting down innovation. Many of these tools offer significant benefits for productivity. They just need to be monitored.
\ Some companies have instituted harsh bans on any outside tools. I really don’t recommend this approach. Bans often prompt employees to seek unsanctioned workarounds that are more difficult to monitor.
\ The better approach is to let experimentation continue while ensuring copilots remain within defined boundaries.
Approval cannot be treated as a one-time exercise. Copilots change as new plugins, integrations, and data connections are introduced.
\ They need to be managed as living systems. Ongoing monitoring and regular reviews are critical. Without oversight, copilots drift back into shadow IT, and they do so at a faster pace than traditional applications.
Copilots and tools like them are not going anywhere soon. And for good reason. I myself leverage AI tools to enhance my work and productivity.
\ These tools will continue to multiply across functions, whether IT is ready or not.
\ The challenge is to move from fragmented adoption to structured systems. With visibility, standards, and oversight, copilots can be turned into infrastructure that strengthens the enterprise instead of weakening it.
\ This prevents a repeat of shadow IT and avoids another cycle of technical debt.
\ More importantly, it ensures that copilots become a reliable source of productivity rather than a hidden risk.
. . .
Nick Talwar is a CTO, ex-Microsoft, and a hands-on AI engineer who supports executives in navigating AI adoption. He shares insights on AI-first strategies to drive bottom-line impact.
→ Follow him on LinkedIn to catch his latest thoughts.
→ Subscribe to his free Substack for in-depth articles delivered straight to your inbox.
→ Watch the live session to see how leaders in highly regulated industries leverage AI to cut manual work and drive ROI.


Investors are better off buying ETFs than buying shares in a firm that’s simply putting a crypto asset on its balance sheet, argues Bitwise’s Matt Hougan. Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan says digital asset treasuries need to start taking the hard path if they want to stand out from the crowd; otherwise, investors are better off investing in crypto exchange-traded funds instead.One of the best ways to discern whether a digital asset treasury (DAT) is worth looking at is to ask the question, “Are they doing something hard?” Hougan argued in an X post on Wednesday.“Buying a crypto asset and putting it on a balance sheet today isn’t hard. It was hard at one point, but it’s not hard now. If that’s all a DAT is doing, you are better off owning an ETF. This is true even if the DAT is staking, as ETFs now stake,” he said.Read more
