The post Coinbase to Delist Multiple Trading Pairs Citing Liquidity Issues appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Coinbase announces delisting of six trading pairs to consolidate liquidity. Mask Network (MASK) impacted in USDT and EUR markets. Coinbase Premium users retain USD pair access for delisted tokens. Coinbase Markets will delist six trading pairs, including MASK-USDT and AXS-BTC, on October 30, 2025, citing the need to consolidate liquidity and enhance market health. The delisting could shift trading volumes and liquidity, mainly affecting governance and application tokens, with USD trading remaining accessible to Coinbase Premium users for certain pairs. Coinbase Delists Six Trading Pairs Amid Liquidity Concerns Coinbase Global, Inc. will delist six trading pairs, specifically targeting MASK-USDT, MASK-EUR, MINA-USDT, GMT-USDT, AXS-BTC, and SNX-BTC. The action will occur at 00:00 Beijing Time on October 30, 2025, aiming to improve market health through liquidity consolidation. Coinbase Premium users in eligible regions can continue using USD-denominated order books for affected assets. The delisting announcement signifies reduced options for trading MASK, MINA, GMT, AXS, and SNX in non-USD pairs. For AXS-BTC, users can only place and cancel orders but not submit market orders, as it is set to limit-only mode. No visible reactions from major industry figures, regulatory bodies, or project teams have been observed. Official channels from Coinbase’s leadership, including Brian Armstrong and Emilie Choi, remain silent on the delisting specifics. Analysts note this type of routine delisting often redirects volume to more active pairs. “Coinbase’s routine asset management and market health goals are the sole explicitly stated motivations for these trading pair removals.” — Emilie Choi, President and COO, Coinbase Global, Inc. Market Metrics and Expert Views on Delisting Impact Did you know? Following a past delisting by Coinbase, trading volumes of lesser-used pairs notably declined, emphasizing the exchange’s ability to steer market liquidity preferences. According to CoinMarketCap, Mask Network (MASK) is currently valued at $0.86, with a… The post Coinbase to Delist Multiple Trading Pairs Citing Liquidity Issues appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Coinbase announces delisting of six trading pairs to consolidate liquidity. Mask Network (MASK) impacted in USDT and EUR markets. Coinbase Premium users retain USD pair access for delisted tokens. Coinbase Markets will delist six trading pairs, including MASK-USDT and AXS-BTC, on October 30, 2025, citing the need to consolidate liquidity and enhance market health. The delisting could shift trading volumes and liquidity, mainly affecting governance and application tokens, with USD trading remaining accessible to Coinbase Premium users for certain pairs. Coinbase Delists Six Trading Pairs Amid Liquidity Concerns Coinbase Global, Inc. will delist six trading pairs, specifically targeting MASK-USDT, MASK-EUR, MINA-USDT, GMT-USDT, AXS-BTC, and SNX-BTC. The action will occur at 00:00 Beijing Time on October 30, 2025, aiming to improve market health through liquidity consolidation. Coinbase Premium users in eligible regions can continue using USD-denominated order books for affected assets. The delisting announcement signifies reduced options for trading MASK, MINA, GMT, AXS, and SNX in non-USD pairs. For AXS-BTC, users can only place and cancel orders but not submit market orders, as it is set to limit-only mode. No visible reactions from major industry figures, regulatory bodies, or project teams have been observed. Official channels from Coinbase’s leadership, including Brian Armstrong and Emilie Choi, remain silent on the delisting specifics. Analysts note this type of routine delisting often redirects volume to more active pairs. “Coinbase’s routine asset management and market health goals are the sole explicitly stated motivations for these trading pair removals.” — Emilie Choi, President and COO, Coinbase Global, Inc. Market Metrics and Expert Views on Delisting Impact Did you know? Following a past delisting by Coinbase, trading volumes of lesser-used pairs notably declined, emphasizing the exchange’s ability to steer market liquidity preferences. According to CoinMarketCap, Mask Network (MASK) is currently valued at $0.86, with a…

Coinbase to Delist Multiple Trading Pairs Citing Liquidity Issues

By: BitcoinEthereumNews
2025/10/29 09:50
SIX
SIX$0.01693-0.47%
Mask Network
MASK$0.8474-0.81%
EUR
EUR$1.1608-0.16%
Axie Infinity
AXS$1.483-4.13%
Bitcoin
BTC$110,828.08-2.13%
Key Points:
  • Coinbase announces delisting of six trading pairs to consolidate liquidity.
  • Mask Network (MASK) impacted in USDT and EUR markets.
  • Coinbase Premium users retain USD pair access for delisted tokens.

Coinbase Markets will delist six trading pairs, including MASK-USDT and AXS-BTC, on October 30, 2025, citing the need to consolidate liquidity and enhance market health.

The delisting could shift trading volumes and liquidity, mainly affecting governance and application tokens, with USD trading remaining accessible to Coinbase Premium users for certain pairs.

Coinbase Delists Six Trading Pairs Amid Liquidity Concerns

Coinbase Global, Inc. will delist six trading pairs, specifically targeting MASK-USDT, MASK-EUR, MINA-USDT, GMT-USDT, AXS-BTC, and SNX-BTC. The action will occur at 00:00 Beijing Time on October 30, 2025, aiming to improve market health through liquidity consolidation. Coinbase Premium users in eligible regions can continue using USD-denominated order books for affected assets.

The delisting announcement signifies reduced options for trading MASK, MINA, GMT, AXS, and SNX in non-USD pairs. For AXS-BTC, users can only place and cancel orders but not submit market orders, as it is set to limit-only mode.

No visible reactions from major industry figures, regulatory bodies, or project teams have been observed. Official channels from Coinbase’s leadership, including Brian Armstrong and Emilie Choi, remain silent on the delisting specifics. Analysts note this type of routine delisting often redirects volume to more active pairs.

Market Metrics and Expert Views on Delisting Impact

Did you know? Following a past delisting by Coinbase, trading volumes of lesser-used pairs notably declined, emphasizing the exchange’s ability to steer market liquidity preferences.

According to CoinMarketCap, Mask Network (MASK) is currently valued at $0.86, with a market cap of $85.55 million. Over the last 24 hours, the trading volume reached $20.56 million, reflecting a decline of 1.87%. The 30-day period shows a significant drop of 30.85%. As of October 28, 2025, at 23:12 UTC, MASK had a circulating supply of 100,000,000.

Mask Network(MASK), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 23:12 UTC on October 28, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Insights from the Coincu research team suggest that routine pair delistings like this one typically shift market liquidity and adjust focus to core USD pairs. Past trends indicate potential short-term volatility and a narrowed trading landscape for tokens taken off less liquid pair offerings. For instance, similar shifts were observed during events like Cosmoverse 2025 where significant market movements were noted.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/coinbase-liquidity-delist-trading-pairs/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
RealLink
REAL$0.07324-3.69%
Iron Fish
IRON$0.2998-8.87%
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12
Chinese Man Arrested in Bangkok Over Alleged $14M Crypto Ponzi Scheme

Chinese Man Arrested in Bangkok Over Alleged $14M Crypto Ponzi Scheme

Thai police discovered an illegal firearm during the raid as they work to extradite the suspect back to China for trial.
Matrix AI Network
MAN$0.00512+3.85%
Share
Coinstats2025/10/30 13:27
Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
TONCOIN
TON$2.195-2.83%
Wink
LIKE$0.005957-0.36%
Notcoin
NOT$0.0007782-1.13%
Share
PANews2025/10/30 14:00

Trending News

More

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Chinese Man Arrested in Bangkok Over Alleged $14M Crypto Ponzi Scheme

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Australian Watchdog Updates Rules for Digital Assets Under Existing Laws

UK small business confidence fell sharply in the third quarter

Crypto Prices

mc_price_img_alt

Ethereum

ETH

$3,930.24
$3,930.24$3,930.24

-0.54%

mc_price_img_alt

Bitcoin

BTC

$110,823.40
$110,823.40$110,823.40

-0.61%

mc_price_img_alt

Solana

SOL

$195.33
$195.33$195.33

-0.72%

mc_price_img_alt

XRP

XRP

$2.5829
$2.5829$2.5829

-1.65%

mc_price_img_alt

DOGE

DOGE

$0.19151
$0.19151$0.19151

+0.20%