President Donald Trump has been complaining that unless Republicans pass legislation to drastically restrict voting rights, they will lose in November.Writing forPresident Donald Trump has been complaining that unless Republicans pass legislation to drastically restrict voting rights, they will lose in November.Writing for

Trump's huge mistakes could mean Republicans losing the Senate

2026/03/16 21:07
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

President Donald Trump has been complaining that unless Republicans pass legislation to drastically restrict voting rights, they will lose in November.

Writing for MS NOW, Kevin Frey and Jack Fitzpatrick explained that the election overhaul bill known as the SAVE Act, would turn voting into a disaster, particularly for married women and the elderly. Things could be even worse for any military members stationed overseas and who may not have access to the documents necessary to cast a ballot, much less be able to get a photo I.D. that would be acceptable under the requirements in the law.

Currently, only five states indicate citizenship on the "Real ID." About 51 percent of Americans have a valid U.S. passport, USA Today reported. To vote, the name on the passport must match the name on the voter registration. The bill would also end "no excuse" mail-in voting. Several states prioritize mail elections over in-person voting.

All of the new rules would make it more difficult to vote in a year when Republicans aren't all that excited about it, which could be a shot in the foot. Last month's Washington Post-ABC-Ipsos poll showed that only about half of the Trump 2024 voters say they are guaranteed to vote. By contrast, 77 percent of Kamala Harris voters intend to vote. Any barriers to voting could easily turn reluctant voters into non-voters.

"Trump has also threatened to refuse to sign any other legislation until the bill passes. But rather than building momentum, the president’s pressure campaign has exposed deep divisions among Republicans over whether to upend the Senate’s rules to force the bill through," the report said.

The bill will likely fail, coming short of the 60-vote threshold required to end any filibuster. So, Trump has demanded that Republicans kill the filibuster. It's something that Republicans have been resistant to doing, thus far. But the GOP is still pressing.

The only solution the Senate GOP can come up with is a slate of floor speeches where members can talk as long as they want about the measure. Democrats, who generally support all Americans voting, are ready for a fight.

Eliminating the filibuster has generally been known as the "nuclear option." The biggest problem that Republicans face, however, is that if they kill the filibuster this year and lose the 2026 midterm elections, it could destroy whatever future legislation that Republicans want to stop in a new session of the legislature.

Some far-right Republican stawarts are all for it. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), who will be out of the U.S. Senate next year, called on his colleagues, “do it anyway.”

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) suggested holding a vote on the rules to see whether it would pass. It sets up another conflict with President Donald Trump.

Sen. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) said he’s “hesitant” to kill the filibuster and lower the 60-vote rule, arguing he doesn’t want to “harm the long-term protections of the Senate, because I think that would ultimately hurt North Carolinians.”

“The practicality of doing it just isn’t apparent to me, simply because as soon as you start talking about amendments, the clock resets, and this will go on week after week, month after month — chew up the rest of the year,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) told MS NOW Thursday.

As it stands, if they held a vote on changing the rules, it would not pass.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Trump rages at 'independent' Supreme Court judges: 'I just want smart decisions'

Trump rages at 'independent' Supreme Court judges: 'I just want smart decisions'

President Donald Trump raged at "independent" Supreme Court judges on Monday during a bill signing ceremony in the Oval Office. Trump and several administration
Share
Rawstory2026/03/17 05:07
Vitalik Buterin Pushes Simpler Ethereum Node Setup

Vitalik Buterin Pushes Simpler Ethereum Node Setup

TLDR Vitalik Buterin supported a Nimbus proposal to merge Ethereum’s two clients into a single program. He said running two daemons makes node operation harder
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/17 04:46