American basketball player Elizabeth Means, who is seeking Filipino citizenship to represent Gilas Women internationally, gets asked by Senator Jinggoy Estrada American basketball player Elizabeth Means, who is seeking Filipino citizenship to represent Gilas Women internationally, gets asked by Senator Jinggoy Estrada

Why Elizabeth Means’ Senate moment should spark a bigger conversation on women in sports

2026/03/11 20:32
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

MANILA, Philippines – Last March 3, American basketball player Elizabeth Means sat before lawmakers, seeking naturalization to suit up for Gilas Pilipinas Women in international competitions. 

What started as a healthy discussion for the 23-year-old Means, meant to be granted Filipino citizenship alongside former UAAP MVP Malick Dious, turned into an uncalled-for moment about her personal life. 

“Do you have a Filipino boyfriend?” Senator Jinggoy Estrada asked Means during the hearing, in front of Samahang Basketbol ng Pilipinas officials and other Senate guests. 

“Not yet po,” Means answered. 

“Maybe Senator (Kiko) Pangilinan might want to apply,” Estrada replied. “Sorry kay (to) Sharon (Pangilinan’s wife).”

While Means’ naturalization, along with Diouf’s, passed the third and final reading in the Senate, Estrada’s comment naturally drew flak.

For Ceej Tantengco-Malolos, founder of women-led sports media organization Go Hard Girls, the rather unsettling scene on the Senate floor is a microcosm of society’s misogynistic norms, especially in male-dominated spaces, like politics and sports.

“The reason why it should spark a conversation is because this is bigger than Jinggoy Estrada,” Tantengco-Malolos told Rappler. “These are symptoms of a society in which respect for women is treated as optional.”

“There should be a conversation about what it really means to respect women athletes. It’s very easy after the SEA (Southeast Asian) Games, or Olympics, to say, ‘Go women.’ Supporting women is more than just saying girl power.”

More work to do

In the same week, another lawmaker, Quezon City 4th District Representative Bong Suntay, suggested having a sexual fantasy about actress Anne Curtis during the Congress’ deliberations on Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment cases.

In Estrada’s case, the mood in the Senate room was light, but the uncomfortable feeling from the intrusiveness of his question was sheathed. 

Mau Belen, the first female coach in the PBA and a national team coach in 3×3 basketball, said the moment highlights how women in sports are still perceived.

“As someone who has been around women’s basketball for years and works closely with female athletes, moments like what happened between Jinggoy Estrada and Elizabeth Means matter because they reflect how women in sports are sometimes still talked about or treated,” Belen told Rappler.

“So, when remarks like that happen, it reminds us that there is still work to do in making sure women in sports are respected for what they bring to the game.”

Sharon Cabusao Silva, a women’s rights activist and executive director of Lila Pilipina, said the incident should also serve as a reminder, especially for young men, about the importance of respecting women and recognizing their role in sports.

“Women athletes play an important role in breaking the limited traditional roles or characteristics often ascribed to women,” Cabusao Silva told Rappler. “In victory, they provide pride for their nation, particularly for women who aspire to embody the same qualities they display.”

“We need to remind men that women must be treated on equal terms. They should not trivialize women’s achievements, status, and concerns, or think that women only find meaning and importance in having men or relationships around them.”

For Tantengco-Malolos, the criticism surrounding both incidents should not fade quickly, especially during International Women’s Month.

“This is not an isolated case,” said Tantengco-Malolos. “There should be a conversation to be had about our lawmakers showing up to their jobs, for which they are paid with taxpayers’ money — our money —and using their time to make these kinds of jokes in a work setting.”

“I don’t feel good that my taxes as a woman during Women’s Month are being used to pay the salary of men who disrespect women.”

Respect, at the most basic level, should remain paramount in any space, whether in sports, politics, or everyday life.

“There should be a long-term investment, and we won’t make progress unless respect is guaranteed,” Tantengco-Malolos said in a mix of Filipino and English. “Everyone is the child of a mother, and it should be so basic to respect women.”

“Respect is basic and fundamental in any social relation, and it should be demanded most from people who wield power or authority, who are more often men,” Cabusao Silva added.

‘Model respect every day’

Means, a 6-foot forward, was a US NCAA Division II player for Westminster University. She played one professional season in Ecuador, putting up 10.2 points and 10.8 rebounds.

Days before the Senate hearing, Means led the Pilipinas Aguilas to a title in the 2026 3×3 BITL held in Bangkok, Thailand, together with Filipina teammates Mikka Cacho, Trina Guytingco, and Camille Malagar. The team finished the tournament with a 6-0 record.

Their run was cited in the hearing of the Senate committee on justice and human rights, headed by Pangilinan. 

For Belen, meaningful change in how women are valued in sports can begin with everyday conversations, both on and off the court.

“As coaches, mentors, and leaders, we have a responsibility to model respect every day,” she said. “In sports, we always talk about discipline, character, and teamwork. Part of that is understanding that women deserve the same respect on and off the court.”

“When young athletes grow up seeing women as teammates, competitors, and leaders, it naturally shapes how they treat them in life as well.”

Tangtengco-Malolos hopes the incident sparks dialogue that will denormalize such remarks.

“You have to talk to your coworkers, talk to your barkada, talk to your sons, talk to the men in your circle,” Tangtengco-Malolos said. “If we’re talking about men who do not respect women, if their problem is men who don’t respect women, I highly doubt that someone like me will be able to change their mind. The man who needs the most change is exactly the man who will not listen to me.”

“I think the reminder for Women’s Month is that the responsibility to create change is not all be seen as a women’s issue. The responsibility for equity is not a women’s issue. The burden of advocating or convincing people should not all be on women. The responsibility of creating a more fair, equitable, and empowering world is the responsibility of men and women equally.” – with reports from Marcus Isaac Bandong/Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler to XRP Investor: Once It Starts, There Is No Stopping This Perfect Catalyst

Time Traveler (@Traveler2236), a well-known crypto commentator and enthusiast, has shared a detailed projection for XRP’s price progression in 2026. His forecast
Share
Timestabloid2026/03/11 21:31
The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The path to clarity: BIR’s new audit framework

The first quarter of 2026 has been anything but quiet for taxpayers. Along with the preparations for filing income tax returns, the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/11 20:30
PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish

PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish

BitcoinWorld PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish The cryptocurrency world is abuzz with a significant event: a massive PYUSD token burn involving 600 million units of the stablecoin. This astonishing development, first reported by Whale Alert, saw a substantial portion of PYUSD removed from circulation from an unknown wallet. Such an event naturally sparks curiosity and raises questions about its implications for the stablecoin’s stability and future trajectory. What does it mean when such a large sum simply vanishes? What Exactly is a PYUSD Token Burn? Before diving into the specifics of this event, it is crucial to understand what a token burn entails. In simple terms, a token burn is the permanent removal of cryptocurrency tokens from circulation. This is achieved by sending tokens to an unspendable wallet address, often referred to as a “burner” address, where they can never be retrieved or used again. This process effectively reduces the total supply of the cryptocurrency. Why Burn Tokens? Token burns are often executed for several reasons: To reduce supply and potentially increase scarcity, which could lead to an increase in value if demand remains constant. To stabilize a cryptocurrency’s price, particularly for stablecoins. As part of a deflationary mechanism or to implement specific tokenomics strategies. To signal commitment to the project’s long-term health and value. The 600 Million PYUSD Token Burn: What Happened? Whale Alert, a well-known blockchain tracker, recently flagged a colossal transaction: 600 million PYUSD being transferred to an unknown wallet, which was subsequently identified as a burn address. The details surrounding the origin and specific intent behind this particular burn remain somewhat mysterious. However, the outcome is clear: these 600 million PYUSD tokens are now permanently out of circulation. This scale of a PYUSD token burn is not an everyday occurrence. It represents a substantial reduction in the overall supply of the stablecoin. While the exact reasoning from the entity initiating the burn is not public, such large-scale actions are typically strategic, aimed at influencing market dynamics or fulfilling predefined tokenomic policies. Why Does This PYUSD Token Burn Matter for the Stablecoin? A burn of this magnitude carries significant weight, especially for a stablecoin like PYUSD. Stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value, often pegged to a fiat currency like the US dollar. Reducing the supply can have several implications: Scarcity and Value: By decreasing the total available supply, the burn could theoretically enhance the scarcity of PYUSD. For a stablecoin, this often means reinforcing its peg rather than driving up its price above the peg. Peg Stability: A controlled burn can be a mechanism to help maintain the stablecoin’s peg to its underlying asset. If the stablecoin’s market price deviates below its peg, reducing supply can help bring it back into line. Market Confidence: Large, well-communicated burns can sometimes boost investor confidence, signaling that the issuers are actively managing the token’s supply to ensure its stability and health. However, an ‘unknown wallet’ aspect adds a layer of intrigue. What Are the Potential Impacts of Such a Large PYUSD Token Burn? The immediate impact of the 600 million PYUSD token burn is a reduction in the total circulating supply. This action, while seemingly straightforward, can ripple through the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. For PYUSD holders and potential investors, understanding these potential impacts is key. One primary effect is on the supply-demand equilibrium. With fewer tokens available, if demand for PYUSD remains consistent or grows, the stablecoin’s peg could be strengthened. Moreover, such a substantial burn might also be part of a larger strategy to comply with regulatory requirements or to adjust the stablecoin’s backing reserves. It is important to consider the transparency surrounding such events. While the act of burning is verifiable on the blockchain, the ‘unknown wallet’ aspect of this particular burn leaves room for speculation about its origins and ultimate goals. Transparency in such large-scale operations often builds greater trust within the community. In conclusion, the recent 600 million PYUSD token burn is a remarkable event that underscores the dynamic nature of the stablecoin market. While the exact motivations behind this specific burn from an unknown wallet remain to be fully clarified, its immediate effect is a significant reduction in PYUSD’s circulating supply. This move has the potential to influence the stablecoin’s scarcity, strengthen its peg, and shape market perceptions, ultimately contributing to the ongoing evolution of the digital asset landscape. Frequently Asked Questions About the PYUSD Token Burn Here are some common questions regarding token burns and the recent PYUSD event: Q1: What is a cryptocurrency token burn? A1: A token burn is the process of permanently removing cryptocurrency tokens from circulation by sending them to an unspendable wallet address. This reduces the total supply of the token. Q2: Why do projects conduct token burns? A2: Projects burn tokens for various reasons, including reducing supply to potentially increase scarcity, maintaining a stable price (especially for stablecoins), implementing deflationary tokenomics, or signaling commitment to the project’s long-term health. Q3: How does a PYUSD token burn affect its value? A3: For a stablecoin like PYUSD, a token burn is typically used to help maintain its peg to the US dollar by adjusting supply. While it reduces scarcity, its primary goal is usually to reinforce stability rather than to increase its price above the peg. Q4: Is the 600 million PYUSD burn a positive or negative event? A4: Generally, a controlled token burn is considered a positive mechanism for managing supply and potentially strengthening a stablecoin’s peg. The specific details, like the ‘unknown wallet’ in this case, might raise questions about transparency, but the act of burning itself is a common strategy. Q5: How can I verify a token burn? A5: Token burns are recorded on the blockchain. You can typically verify a burn by looking up the transaction on a blockchain explorer, where you will see tokens sent to a known burn address (an address with no private key, making the funds irretrievable). The world of stablecoins is constantly evolving, and events like this PYUSD token burn are crucial to understanding its dynamics. If you found this article insightful, please consider sharing it with your network on social media. Your shares help us bring important crypto news and analysis to a wider audience! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin market stability. This post PYUSD Token Burn: Unpacking the Astonishing 600 Million Vanish first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 01:40