The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission expanded its guidance on the use of stablecoins as collateral in derivatives markets, reissuing Staff Letter 25-40The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission expanded its guidance on the use of stablecoins as collateral in derivatives markets, reissuing Staff Letter 25-40

CFTC Broadens Stablecoin Collateral Rules, Clearing Path for Bank-Issued Tokens

2026/02/08 01:41
3 min read

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission expanded its guidance on the use of stablecoins as collateral in derivatives markets, reissuing Staff Letter 25-40 with a key change that adds national trust banks to the list of eligible issuers. The update aims to align the agency’s no-action position with recent developments in federal stablecoin law and bank charters.

Expanded Collateral Definition Includes Federal Banks

The CFTC’s Market Participants Division on Feb. 6, 2026, issued a revised version of Staff Letter 25-40 that widens the definition of “payment stablecoin” to explicitly allow tokens issued by national trust banks to be treated as permissible collateral under the letter’s no-action framework. This framework lets futures commission merchants consider certain digital assets, including payment stablecoins, as customer margin collateral and lets firms hold proprietary stablecoins in segregated customer accounts under specified conditions.

CFTC Broadens Stablecoin Collateral Rules, Clearing Path for Bank-Issued Tokens

The original letter, issued Dec. 8, 2025, excluded national trust banks by omission, focusing on stablecoins from state-regulated money transmitters or trust companies. After CFTC staff realized the wording overlooked federally chartered institutions, they corrected the definition to reflect the current regulatory landscape.

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig emphasized the change reflects the role national trust banks now play in the stablecoin ecosystem. He noted the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has granted charters to these banks, enabling them to custody and issue payment stablecoins under federal supervision. The expanded definition ensures those stablecoins can serve as eligible collateral without conflicting with the CFTC’s no-action position.

Impacts on Markets and Regulation

The revised guidance comes as part of broader federal efforts to create a regulated stablecoin framework, including implementation steps following the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) enacted in July 2025. That law requires stablecoin issuers to meet reserve, audit and supervision standards and defines permissible issuers, including bank subsidiaries and federally chartered entities.

By aligning its collateral rules with this framework, the CFTC is smoothing the way for regulated financial institutions to participate in digital asset markets. Futures commission merchants will still need to comply with conditions such as risk safeguards, haircut policies set by clearing organizations and reporting requirements to rely on the no-action relief.

Industry analysts say the update could encourage greater use of tokenized collateral in U.S. futures markets. Allowing bank-issued stablecoins into regulated collateral systems may lower barriers for traditional and crypto firms alike, provided issuers meet reserve transparency and risk management standards.

The CFTC’s revision expands stablecoin collateral eligibility to include federally chartered national trust banks, aligning derivatives rules with federal stablecoin legislation and potentially broadening institutional participation in token-based collateral markets. 

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0.07735
$0.07735$0.07735
+1.76%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

White House adviser: Cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage

PANews reported on June 18 that according to Jinshi, a US White House adviser said that the cryptocurrency bill is "very close" to passage, which will create demand for the
Share
PANews2025/06/18 23:52
Trump caves on his own snubs as retaliation ploy against Dem governors backfires

Trump caves on his own snubs as retaliation ploy against Dem governors backfires

President Donald Trump on Wednesday walked back a snub he gave to two Democratic Governors. Last week, Trump notably did not invite Democratic governors Wes Moore
Share
Rawstory2026/02/12 10:29
Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

The post Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This morning, Bitcoin Core developers celebrated improved block reconstruction statistics for node operators while conveniently ignoring the reason for these statistics — the downward trend in fees for Bitcoin’s security budget. Reacting with heart emojis and thumbs up to a green chart showing over 80% “successful compact block reconstructions without any requested transactions,” they conveniently omitted red trend lines of the fees that Bitcoin users pay for mining security which powered those green statistics. Block reconstructions occur when a node requests additional information about transactions within a compact block. Although compact blocks allow nodes to quickly relay valid bundles of transactions across the internet, the more frequently that nodes can reconstruct without extra, cumbersome transaction requests from their peers is a positive trend. Because so many nodes switched over in August to relay transactions bidding 0.1 sat/vB across their mempools, nodes now have to request less transaction data to reconstruct blocks containing sub-1 sat/vB transactions. After nodes switched over in August to accept and relay pending transactions bidding less than 1 sat/vB, disparate mempools became harmonized as most nodes had a better view of which transactions would likely join upcoming blocks. As a result, block reconstruction times improved, as nodes needed less information about these sub-1 sat/vB transactions. In July, several miners admitted that user demand for Bitcoin blockspace had persisted at such a low that they were willing to accept transaction fees of just 0.1 satoshi per virtual byte — 90% lower than their prior 1 sat/vB minimum. With so many blocks partially empty, they succumbed to the temptation to accept at least something — even 1 billionth of one bitcoin (BTC) — rather than $0 to fill up some of the excess blockspace. Read more: Bitcoin’s transaction fees have fallen to a multi-year low Green stats for block reconstruction after transaction fees crash After…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:07