TLDR Trump administration will meet with banks and crypto firms Monday to resolve stablecoin interest disputes blocking the CLARITY Act The CLARITY Act aims to TLDR Trump administration will meet with banks and crypto firms Monday to resolve stablecoin interest disputes blocking the CLARITY Act The CLARITY Act aims to

Trump White House Convenes Emergency Meeting on Stalled Crypto Bill

2026/01/29 17:10
3 min read

TLDR

  • Trump administration will meet with banks and crypto firms Monday to resolve stablecoin interest disputes blocking the CLARITY Act
  • The CLARITY Act aims to clarify crypto regulation between the SEC and CFTC but has stalled over stablecoin yield rules
  • Banks want to ban third-party stablecoin rewards, warning of potential $6 trillion deposit flight from the banking system
  • Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew support for the bill, calling it anticompetitive, while other crypto firms like Ripple and Kraken support it
  • The White House crypto policy council is hosting the meeting to gather feedback on resolving the legislative impasse

The Trump administration has scheduled a meeting Monday with banking and cryptocurrency executives to address a months-long deadlock over crypto regulation legislation. The White House crypto policy council will host the gathering to resolve disputes blocking the CLARITY Act.

The CLARITY Act is a proposed crypto market-structure bill that defines how digital assets would be regulated in the United States. The legislation would divide oversight responsibilities between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

A scheduled Banking Committee vote was postponed earlier this month. Lawmakers and industry groups raised concerns about provisions governing stablecoin interest payments.

The meeting will bring together industry trade groups to discuss how the bill treats interest and rewards on dollar-pegged stablecoins. Reuters first reported the planned White House gathering.

The White House crypto policy council includes officials from the National Economic Council, Treasury, and other agencies. The group aims to collect direct feedback from market participants on resolving the bill’s problem areas.

Banks and Crypto Companies Clash Over Yield Products

The central dispute involves whether third parties can offer yield on stablecoins. The GENIUS Act, passed in July 2025, prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to users.

However, the legislation leaves unclear whether exchanges or other intermediaries can provide rewards. This gap has created tension between crypto companies and traditional banks.

Bank lobbyists have pushed Congress for months to ban third-party stablecoin yield completely. They argue these products could trigger deposit flight from the banking system.

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan warned on January 15 that interest-bearing stablecoins could pull $6 trillion out of US banks. He said this could limit lending capacity and increase borrowing costs.

Crypto exchanges like Coinbase currently offer rewards on stablecoin holdings. These companies argue banks are trying to eliminate competition through legislation.

Crypto Industry Remains Divided on Legislation

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong withdrew company support for the bill on January 14. Armstrong stated Coinbase would “rather have no bill than a bad bill.”

Armstrong called the proposed restrictions anticompetitive. He said banks were using their lobbying power to shut down crypto alternatives.

Not all crypto companies oppose the current version. Coin Center, a16z, the Digital Chamber, Kraken, and Ripple $XRP have expressed support for the Senate’s CLARITY Act draft.

The Blockchain Association confirmed it would participate in Monday’s meeting. CEO Summer Mersinger thanked White House AI and Crypto Czar David Sacks and Patrick Witt, director of the White House crypto council.

The Crypto Council for Innovation also confirmed attendance. Trade groups hope the meeting will break the legislative stalemate.

The White House meeting represents the Trump administration’s first direct intervention in the stablecoin dispute. Industry representatives will present their positions on yield products and market structure.

The post Trump White House Convenes Emergency Meeting on Stalled Crypto Bill appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00