The post PYTH Technical Analysis Jan 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and MarketThe post PYTH Technical Analysis Jan 28 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction Volume Profile and Market

PYTH Technical Analysis Jan 28

Volume story – what participation tells us about conviction

Volume Profile and Market Participation

PYTH’s 24-hour trading volume was realized at the 70.66 million dollar level. This volume corresponds to approximately 120% of the last 7-day average volume and indicates moderate market participation. Although the price shows a 5.87% increase, it remains within the general downtrend, and the volume profile indicates that this movement is weak in terms of conviction. Volume is particularly concentrated at lower levels; the value area (high-volume price range) has formed in the 0.0580-0.0620 band, where market participants appear inclined toward consolidation. This aligns with the bearish short-term trend where the price remains below EMA20 (0.06), but the volume during the rise being lower compared to declines raises questions about the conviction of participation. There seems to be a retail-focused movement among market participants; large block transactions are limited. The latest MTF (multi-timeframe) volume analysis has identified 13 strong levels in 1D/3D/1W timeframes: 3 supports/3 resistances in 1D, 2 resistances in 3D, 2 supports/3 resistances balance in 1W. This distribution emphasizes that volume supports the downtrend and requires extra volume for an upward breakout.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Accumulation signals for PYTH are limited but present. Volume increases are observed at lower levels (0.0547-0.0576 supports); volume spikes in these bands may indicate potential smart money entry. RSI at 48.56 is in the neutral zone with no volume divergence – volume decreased as price fell, which could suggest selling exhaustion. At the value area low (around 0.0580), volume has formed a POC (point of control), providing a testable base for accumulation. If the price holds the 0.0610 support (81/100 score) with volume confirmation, the accumulation scenario strengthens. PYTH Spot Analysis details these levels.

Distribution Risks

Distribution warnings are more pronounced. During the upward movement (5.87%), volume was 30% lower than on down days – a classic bearish divergence. With Supertrend bearish and resistance at 0.07, there is a risk of volume climax (high-volume rejection) at 0.0622-0.0658 resistances. MACD shows negative histogram with volume divergence; volume contraction as price rises is a typical distribution signal. The 1W timeframe’s 3 resistance weights imply institutional selling pressure, though we do not claim definitive positions.

Price-Volume Alignment

Does volume confirm the price movement? Short answer: No, full confirmation is absent. The +5.87% bounce within the downtrend is low-volume – we would expect volume expansion for a healthy upmove, but contraction is present here. Volume is higher on declines (150% average), confirming sellers’ conviction. Price below EMA20 is supported by bearish MACD; the volume profile increases fakeout risk. Volume confirmation is essential at 0.0610 support; a break could lead to bearish target 0.0342 (22 score). Conversely, breaking 0.0622 resistance with high volume could enable bullish 0.0960 (31 score), but it remains weak for now. PYTH Futures Analysis includes futures volume details.

Big Player Activity

Big player (institutional) activities are unclear but show clues. 15% of 24h volume comes from large block trades (500k+ USD), mostly buy-directed in the 0.0590-0.0610 range. However, selling volume spikes are seen during resistance tests in the downtrend – whale distribution suspicion. Volume delta (buy-sell difference) is negative; net selling pressure. MTF 1W resistance weight suggests institutional resistance formation. For a healthy pattern, accumulation volume increase around POC is needed; currently, speculative retail dominates.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at 88,934$ +0.95% in downtrend; Supertrend bearish, supports 88,346-84,681. PYTH is highly correlated with BTC (0.85%); BTC downside crushes altcoins. If BTC fails to break 89,405 resistance, PYTH pulls back to 0.0610 support. BTC dominance rise crushes alt volume – critical for PYTH below BTC 86k, activating PYTH bearish target. If BTC breaks out (91k+), expect PYTH volume expansion.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook: Cautious bearish. Volume confirms the downtrend; bounce is weak, divergences carry distribution risk. Key watch: Volume spike at 0.0610 support (accumulation?) vs rejection (distribution). BTC downtrend reduces altcoin participation. Short-term: Neutral if holds above 0.0610, bearish to 0.0547 below. Long-term: Volume above average needed for accumulation. Risk management: Do not trade without volume confirmation; 200% volume expansion required for healthy uptrend.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/pyth-volume-analysis-28-january-2026-accumulation-distribution

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Anchorage Digital applies for a Fed master account; what is it?

Anchorage Digital applies for a Fed master account; what is it?

The post Anchorage Digital applies for a Fed master account; what is it? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Anchorage Digital Bank has formally applied for a Federal Reserve master account, according to a database update published Friday. The filing confirms months of speculation after Anchorage co-founder and CEO Nathan McCauley declined to comment on the matter in June.  According to the Crypto In America podcast host Eleanor Terrett, the crypto bank for institutions submitted an application to federal regulators on August 28.  Another semi-interesting thing in this latest update: the Fed has rejected a request from a Tier 1 institution. Notable because under the Fed’s 2022 guidelines applications from Tier 1 institutions are “generally … subject to a less intensive and more streamlined review” pic.twitter.com/vn8uYkycui — Bank Reg Blog (@bank_reg) September 19, 2025 Anchorage is the only digital asset company that holds a national trust bank charter, a designation it received from the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in 2021. That charter authorizes Anchorage to operate as a federally regulated trust bank but does not grant the same payment access that comes with a Fed master account.  What is a Fed master account? A master account is the operational foundation that allows banks to settle transactions directly with the central bank and hold balances with the Federal Reserve. Depository institutions use these accounts to hold reserves and access the Fed’s payment services, including settlement of wire transfers, check clearing, and other interbank transactions. Without such access, banks must use third-party intermediaries to route payments. If Anchorage Digital acquired the account, it could become the first and only crypto bank that could hold assets outside digital currencies, just like traditional financial institutions.  Anchorage became one of the first federally chartered digital-asset banks when the OCC conditionally approved its national trust bank charter in January 2021. However, a little over a year later, the OCC issued…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 15:49
Could Ripple’s XRP Replace SWIFT? New Signals Hint at Potential Financial Power Shift

Could Ripple’s XRP Replace SWIFT? New Signals Hint at Potential Financial Power Shift

Global payments rarely face direct challenges to long-established infrastructure. The debate around Ripple and XRP now questions whether cross-border finance could
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 22:00
EY warns firms they must own the wallet to keep their customers

EY warns firms they must own the wallet to keep their customers

The post EY warns firms they must own the wallet to keep their customers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In the evolving landscape of digital finance, Big
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 22:10