The firm argued crypto can counter AI centralization by giving users control over identity, data ownership, and payments.The firm argued crypto can counter AI centralization by giving users control over identity, data ownership, and payments.

a16z Maps 11 Paths Where Crypto Meets AI

3 min read

Andreessen Horowitz’s crypto team over the week outlined 11 areas where blockchain networks could intersect with artificial intelligence, laying out how crypto tools might shape identity, payments, and ownership as AI systems spread across the internet.

The firm framed crypto less as a speculative asset class and more as infrastructure that could counter growing centralization in AI by giving users control over data, identity, and economic participation.

a16z Lays Out Use Cases as AI Power Concentrates

In a January 20 post on X, a16z crypto argued that the web is moving toward interfaces dominated by AI prompts, raising questions about who controls data, distribution, and revenue as traditional websites lose traffic.

The firm said blockchains can provide a neutral base layer for AI systems by supporting persistent user context, portable identities for AI agents, and on-chain payments that work without platform gatekeepers.

Several of the ideas focused on identity and trust, with one example being decentralized proof of personhood, which aims to help platforms distinguish humans from bots without relying on centralized ID providers.

The post pointed to existing projects such as World’s Proof of Human and newer systems like the Solana Attestation Service, which lets users link off-chain credentials to wallets while keeping data private.

Payments were another recurring theme. a16z described how blockchains could support micropayments between AI agents, content creators, and end users. That includes revenue sharing when AI tools rely on third-party content, as well as systems where web crawlers pay sites directly for access to data.

The firm noted that nearly half of internet traffic now comes from automated sources, while more website operators are blocking AI scrapers, a tension that has pushed companies like Cloudflare to sell blocking tools.

The post also highlighted decentralized physical infrastructure networks, or DePIN, as a way to pool unused compute and energy resources for AI training and inference. By aggregating hardware from gaming PCs and data centers, these networks aim to reduce reliance on large cloud providers.

Why Identity, Payments, and Ownership Keep Resurfacing

Many of the ideas echoed concerns raised elsewhere in the crypto industry. For example, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently said that he plans to leave centralized social media behind in favor of decentralized platforms, arguing that shared data layers allow competition without locking users into a single interface. His comments reflected a broader push to separate identity and content from platform control.

The Ethereum Foundation has also moved in this direction. Last year, it launched a new AI team focused on agentic payments and coordination, with the stated goal of making Ethereum a settlement layer for AI agents and machine-to-machine transactions. Foundation developer Davide Crapis said at the time that AI systems need neutral infrastructure for value transfer and reputation, rather than relying on a few large technology firms.

a16z’s map does not claim these systems are close to mass adoption. Several use cases, including AI companions owned by users or fully open agent-to-agent markets, are described as longer-term ideas. Still, the firm’s outline shows where investors and builders think crypto could fit as AI systems move from isolated tools into always-on intermediaries between people, data, and money.

The post a16z Maps 11 Paths Where Crypto Meets AI appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19