Stablecoin yield restrictions may drive capital offshore, warns market expert. US regulations could push investors towards synthetic, unregulated financial structuresStablecoin yield restrictions may drive capital offshore, warns market expert. US regulations could push investors towards synthetic, unregulated financial structures

Stablecoin Yield Restrictions May Drive Capital Offshore, Warns Expert

3 min read
  • Stablecoin yield restrictions may drive capital offshore, warns market expert.
  • US regulations could push investors towards synthetic, unregulated financial structures.
  • Global competition intensifies as US stablecoin yield ban gains traction.

Proposed regulations under the US CLARITY Act could lead to significant consequences for regulated financial markets. According to Colin Butler, head of markets at Mega Matrix, restrictions on stablecoin yields could push capital out of regulated markets and into opaque, unregulated financial structures. Butler explained that banning compliant stablecoins from offering yield does not safeguard the US financial system. Instead, it risks sidelining regulated institutions while accelerating capital migration beyond US oversight.


Stablecoins such as USDC, which are fully backed by cash or short-term Treasuries, are prohibited under the newly enacted GENIUS Act from offering interest directly to holders. These payment stablecoins are treated as digital cash rather than financial products capable of generating yield. Butler pointed out that this creates a structural imbalance, especially given that short-term Treasuries currently yield around 3.6%, while traditional savings accounts offer much lower rates. This regulatory shift could push investors toward exchanges that offer higher yields on stablecoin deposits, ultimately drawing capital away from traditional banks.


In addition, Butler highlighted that the competitive dynamic between banks and stablecoins isn’t based on a direct comparison between stablecoins and bank deposits. Rather, it’s the discrepancy between low bank deposit rates and the higher yields available through stablecoin investments. The financial incentive for investors to move capital is clear when stablecoins can offer 4% to 5% yields, compared to near-zero yields at banks.


Also Read: Shiba Inu Ecosystem Faces Uncertainty Amid Developer Silence


The Risk of Unregulated Synthetic Dollars

Experts also warned of the potential rise in demand for synthetic dollars—dollar-pegged instruments that maintain parity through structured trading strategies, rather than by holding fiat reserves. Andrei Grachev, founding partner at Falcon Finance, emphasized that the real danger lies not in synthetics themselves but in unregulated synthetic structures that operate without transparency. A notable example of this is Ethena’s USDe, which generates yield through crypto collateral and perpetual futures. Such products occupy a regulatory gray area, falling outside the scope of the GENIUS Act’s definition of payment stablecoins.


Butler further stressed that Congress’s efforts to protect the banking system may inadvertently accelerate the migration of capital into structures that are largely outside US regulatory control. This would not only reduce transparency but also risk the capital being held in offshore, opaque financial environments, beyond the reach of US regulators.


Global Implications of Yield Restrictions

The potential global impact of these restrictions on US stablecoins could have far-reaching consequences. Butler argued that the US may find itself in direct competition with countries like China, where the digital yuan has already become interest-bearing. Furthermore, nations such as Singapore, Switzerland, and the UAE are actively developing frameworks for yield-bearing digital instruments. If the US enforces a ban on yield-bearing stablecoins, global capital may choose to flow toward interest-bearing currencies outside of the US jurisdiction, particularly those offered by China.


Grachev also expressed concern that the US could lose its leadership in the development of transparent, compliant yield products. The current approach under the CLARITY Act could send the wrong message by treating all yield products the same, without recognizing the distinction between regulated, transparent structures and less regulated alternatives.


Also Read: Ripple Executive Reveals Key Feature for RLUSD’s Multichain Scalability


The post Stablecoin Yield Restrictions May Drive Capital Offshore, Warns Expert appeared first on 36Crypto.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

eurosecurity.net Expands Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery Capabilities Amid Rising Investor Losses

eurosecurity.net Expands Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery Capabilities Amid Rising Investor Losses

New York, NY/ GlobePRWire / Feb 6, 2026 – eurosecurity.net announces the expansion of its cryptocurrency asset recovery services, reflecting increased demand from
Share
CryptoReporter2026/02/06 17:24
Ethereum to boost scalability and roll out Fusaka upgrade on Dec 3

Ethereum to boost scalability and roll out Fusaka upgrade on Dec 3

Ethereum's Fusaka update may happen on December 3, based on the date set in the latest developer call.
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/19 17:00
Google Cloud taps EigenLayer to bring trust to agentic payments

Google Cloud taps EigenLayer to bring trust to agentic payments

The post Google Cloud taps EigenLayer to bring trust to agentic payments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Two days after unveiling AP2 — a universal payment layer for AI agents that supports everything from credit cards to stablecoins — Google and EigenLayer have released details of their partnership to bring verifiability and restaking security to the stack, using Ethereum. In addition to enabling verifiable compute and slashing-backed payment coordination, EigenCloud will support insured and sovereign AI agents, which introduce consequences for failure or deviation from specified behavior. Sovereign agents are positioned as autonomous actors that can own property, make decisions, and execute actions independently — think smart contracts with embedded intelligence. From demos to dollars AP2 extends Google’s agent-to-agent (A2A) protocol using the HTTP 402 status code — long reserved for “payment required” — to standardize payment requests between agents across different networks. It already supports stablecoins like USDC, and Coinbase has demoed an agent checkout using its Wallet-as-a-Service. Paired with a system like Lit Protocol’s Vincent — which enforces per-action policies and key custody at signing — Google’s AP2 with EigenCloud’s verifiability and cross-chain settlement could form an end-to-end trust loop. Payments between agents aren’t as simple as they are often made to sound by “Crypto x AI” LARPs. When an AI agent requests a payment in USDC on Base and the payer’s funds are locked in ETH on Arbitrum, the transaction stalls — unless something abstracts the bridging, swapping and delivery. That’s where EigenCloud comes in. Sreeram Kannan, founder of EigenLayer, said the integration will create agents that not only run on-chain verifiable compute, but are also economically incentivized to behave within programmable bounds. Through restaked operators, EigenCloud powers a verifiable payment service that handles asset routing and chain abstraction, with dishonest behavior subject to slashing. It also introduces cryptographic accountability to the agents themselves, enabling proofs that an agent actually executed the task it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 03:52