Perpetual DEXs now rival CEX volume as Hyperliquid, Aster and Lighter shift competition from airdrops to infrastructure, privacy tools and pro‑grade execution forPerpetual DEXs now rival CEX volume as Hyperliquid, Aster and Lighter shift competition from airdrops to infrastructure, privacy tools and pro‑grade execution for

Perp DEX traders pivot from airdrop hunting to CEX‑style execution quality

Perpetual DEXs now rival CEX volume as Hyperliquid, Aster and Lighter shift competition from airdrops to infrastructure, privacy tools and pro‑grade execution for institutional traders.

Summary
  • Perp DEX volumes have grown to tens of billions daily as leading venues deploy custom chains to cut latency, slippage and fees versus earlier AMM-based designs.​
  • Hyperliquid’s custom L1 targets ~100,000 orders per second, while Aster and Lighter focus on execution precision, Shield Mode privacy and hidden orders to block sandwich bots.​
  • Institutional-style tools like TWAP strategy orders and hidden or delayed‑reveal orders let large traders work size on-chain without leaking information or moving the market.

Decentralized perpetual futures exchanges are experiencing a shift in trader priorities from token airdrops to execution quality, according to industry data showing the sector now rivals centralized exchanges in trading volume.

The perpetual decentralized exchange (Perp DEX) market has reached tens of billions of dollars in daily volume, with annual volumes reaching into the trillions, according to market reports. Platforms including Hyperliquid and Aster have emerged as sector leaders by developing custom blockchain infrastructure designed to enhance transaction speed and reduce latency.

Perp DEX volume and performance

The competitive landscape has shifted from incentive-based user acquisition to technical performance metrics, with traders now prioritizing factors such as slippage reduction, execution speed, and protection from automated trading bots, according to market observers.

Infrastructure developments have become central to platform differentiation. Early decentralized exchanges relied on automated market maker algorithms that experienced performance issues during periods of market volatility. Current market leaders have deployed proprietary blockchain networks to manage increased transaction volumes and reduce fees associated with general-purpose networks such as Ethereum.

Hyperliquid operates a custom blockchain capable of processing 100,000 orders per second, according to the platform’s technical specifications. Competing platforms Aster and Lighter have focused development efforts on execution precision to ensure trades execute at intended price points.

The sector has introduced privacy features to address information leakage concerns on public blockchains. Shield Mode, a privacy tool now available on some platforms, conceals trade details from public view until execution, designed to prevent front-running strategies known as sandwich attacks where automated systems exploit visible pending orders.

The technology separates standard trading activity from bot-driven order flow, offering institutional traders the ability to execute large positions without market impact, according to platform documentation.

Professional trading tools previously limited to traditional financial markets have been integrated into decentralized platforms. Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) orders allow traders to divide large positions into smaller increments to minimize market impact. Hidden order functionality enables limit orders that remain invisible on public order books, preventing information leakage to other market participants.

The availability of institutional-grade trading tools on blockchain-based platforms represents a maturation of the decentralized finance sector, according to industry analysts. The migration of capital from centralized exchanges to blockchain-based alternatives has accelerated demand for infrastructure capable of supporting professional trading operations at scale.

Market Opportunity
Perpetual Protocol Logo
Perpetual Protocol Price(PERP)
$0.07356
$0.07356$0.07356
-3.72%
USD
Perpetual Protocol (PERP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
WIF Price Prediction: Targets $0.46 Breakout by February 2026

WIF Price Prediction: Targets $0.46 Breakout by February 2026

The post WIF Price Prediction: Targets $0.46 Breakout by February 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Timothy Morano Jan 16, 2026 08:57 WIF Price Prediction
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/17 03:29