The post Crypto Investor Loses $50 Million USDT in Address Poisoning Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A cryptocurrency investor lost $50 million in USDTThe post Crypto Investor Loses $50 Million USDT in Address Poisoning Scam appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A cryptocurrency investor lost $50 million in USDT

Crypto Investor Loses $50 Million USDT in Address Poisoning Scam

A cryptocurrency investor lost $50 million in USDT after falling victim to an address poisoning attack, according to blockchain security firm SlowMist. The incident occurred when the victim accidentally sent funds to a fraudulent address that closely resembled their intended destination.

On-chain data from Etherscan shows the victim initially sent a small test transaction of 0.005 USDT to the correct address at 06:20:35. Approximately 12 minutes later, at 06:32:59, the investor transferred the full $50 million to the poisoned address 0xBaFF2F13638C04B10F8119760B2D2aE86b08f8b5. The fraudulent address was copied from the transaction history, where attackers had planted it through earlier small-value transactions.

Rapid Conversion and Money Laundering Tactics

The attacker moved swiftly after receiving the funds. Within 30 minutes, the hacker converted the entire $50 million USDT into DAI through MetaMask Swap. SlowMist reported that the funds were then exchanged for 16,690 ETH. The attacker subsequently routed 16,680 ETH through Tornado Cash, a cryptocurrency mixing service that obscures transaction trails.

Web3 Antivirus discovered that the victim had withdrawn the $50 million from Binance shortly before making the erroneous transfer. The wallet in question had been active for nearly two years, primarily handling transactions in USDT. The stolen funds currently remain at the target address.

Recent Wave of Cryptocurrency Attacks

This incident follows a pattern of escalating cryptocurrency theft.  Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis reported that cryptocurrency theft reached $3.41 billion between January and early December 2025. This figure surpasses the $3.38 billion stolen in the previous year. The $1.5 billion hack of Bybit exchange alone represented 44% of the annual total. The three largest attacks accounted for 69% of all service losses.

Personal wallet compromises have become increasingly prevalent. These attacks grew from 7.3% of total stolen value in 2022 to 44% in 2024. Chainalysis documented 158,000 instances of personal wallet intrusions affecting at least 80,000 distinct victims. Despite the increase in frequency, the total amount stolen from individual wallets decreased to $713 million from $1.5 billion the previous year.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13238/he-sent-a-test-transaction-first-it-didn-t-save-his-50-million

Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.000831
$0.000831$0.000831
-1.18%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

The post Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Trump’s administration
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 01:29
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15