Long-term Bitcoin (BTC) holders are contributing to suppressed spot prices by selling covered call options, which compel market makers to hedge by offloading spot BTC, according to insights from market analyst Jeff Park. This strategy highlights a sophisticated dynamic in the crypto derivatives market, potentially explaining recent price stagnation despite bullish fundamentals.Long-term Bitcoin (BTC) holders are contributing to suppressed spot prices by selling covered call options, which compel market makers to hedge by offloading spot BTC, according to insights from market analyst Jeff Park. This strategy highlights a sophisticated dynamic in the crypto derivatives market, potentially explaining recent price stagnation despite bullish fundamentals.

Long-Term Bitcoin Holders Suppress Spot Prices via Covered Call Options — Analyst Jeff Park

2025/12/15 15:31

Keywords: Bitcoin covered call options, long-term holders BTC selling, Jeff Park Bitcoin analysis, spot price suppression, market makers BTC hedging

Long-term Bitcoin (BTC) holders are contributing to suppressed spot prices by selling covered call options, which compel market makers to hedge by offloading spot BTC, according to insights from market analyst Jeff Park. This strategy highlights a sophisticated dynamic in the crypto derivatives market, potentially explaining recent price stagnation despite bullish fundamentals.

Jeff Park's Analysis on Covered Calls
In a recent thread or report, Jeff Park, a prominent crypto analyst, explained how long-term holders—often called "diamond hands"—are using covered call strategies to generate yield on their BTC holdings. A covered call involves holding spot BTC while selling call options against it, essentially betting that prices won't surge dramatically in the short term. This provides holders with premium income but caps upside potential.

Park notes that as these options are sold, market makers (who buy the calls) must hedge their positions by selling spot Bitcoin to remain delta-neutral. This selling pressure suppresses spot prices, creating a feedback loop where more holders opt for covered calls during sideways markets.

Mechanics of Price Suppression
The process works as follows:

  • Holders Sell Calls: Long-term owners sell out-of-the-money calls, earning premiums while retaining their BTC.
  • Market Makers Hedge: To mitigate risk, makers delta-hedge by selling equivalent spot BTC, increasing sell-side pressure.
  • Spot Price Impact: This hedging amplifies downward or stagnant price action, even amid positive news like ETF inflows.

Park cites data showing a spike in BTC call option open interest, correlating with subdued spot prices around $60,000. "Covered calls are quietly capping BTC's upside," Park tweeted, pointing to institutional players amplifying this effect.

Broader Market Implications
This tactic reflects Bitcoin's maturation, where holders seek passive income without liquidating core positions. However, it could prolong consolidation phases, frustrating short-term traders. Positively, it adds liquidity to options markets and signals confidence in BTC's long-term value.

Analysts like those from Glassnode corroborate this, noting increased options activity among whales. If spot prices break key resistance, it could trigger a "gamma squeeze," forcing makers to buy back BTC and sparking rallies.

Investor Takeaways and Outlook
For retail investors, understanding these derivatives dynamics is crucial amid volatility. Park advises monitoring options data for price signals. As Bitcoin evolves, such strategies may become more prevalent, influencing market behavior.

This analysis sheds light on hidden forces in crypto. For updates on Bitcoin covered call options and spot price suppression, follow our coverage—trade with caution in dynamic markets.

Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Xinjiang Mining Shutdown Sparks Network Security Concerns

Xinjiang Mining Shutdown Sparks Network Security Concerns

The post Xinjiang Mining Shutdown Sparks Network Security Concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin Hashrate Plummets 8%: Xinjiang Mining Shutdown Sparks
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/15 16:50