The symfony/workflow component has long been one of the framework’s most powerful, yet underutilized, gems. It allows developers to decouple business process logic from entity state, transforming complex “spaghetti code” status checks into clean, visualizable directed graphs.
\ For years, however, the component had a strict limitation rooted in its implementation of Petri nets: Tokens were boolean. An object was either in a place (state), or it wasn’t. While you could be in multiple places simultaneously (parallel processing), you couldn’t be in the same place multiple times.
\ Symfony 7.4 changes the game with Weighted Transitions.
This new feature introduces multiplicity. You can now model scenarios where quantities matter: “collect 4 signatures,” “process 5 batch items,” or “wait for 3 subsystems to initialize.”
\ In this article, we will build a robust Multi-Signature Approval System for a FinTech application. We will explore how to configure weighted transitions, implement the entity logic, and verify the flow with rigorous testing — all using Symfony 7.4 and PHP 8.3.
Before writing code, it is crucial to understand why this feature exists.
A State Machine is linear. An elevator is either STOPPED, MOVINGUP, or MOVINGDOWN. It cannot be MOVINGUP twice. This is perfect for simpler statuses (e.g., Order::STATUSPAID).
A Workflow allows an object to sit in multiple places at once. In a “New Employee Onboarding” process, an employee might simultaneously be in:
\ Both must be completed before they move to onboarded.
Prior to Symfony 7.4, if you needed “3 Managers to approve an expense,” you couldn’t model this purely in the Workflow. You had to:
\ With Weighted Transitions, the “counter” is now part of the workflow state itself. The workflow engine natively understands that the subject is in the approved state 3 times.
Let’s create a new Symfony project and install the necessary components.
composer create-project symfony/skeleton:"7.4.*" fintech-approval cd fintech-approval composer require symfony/workflow symfony/framework-bundle symfony/orm-pack symfony/maker-bundle
\ We will also need a database. For this example, we’ll use SQLite for simplicity, but the logic applies to MySQL/PostgreSQL exactly the same.
# .env DATABASE_URL="sqlite:///%kernel.project_dir%/var/data.db"
This is where the magic happens. We will define a workflow called expense_approval.
\ The Scenario:
\ Create or update config/packages/workflow.yaml:
# config/packages/workflow.yaml framework: workflows: expense_approval: type: workflow # MUST be 'workflow', not 'state_machine' audit_trail: enabled: true marking_store: type: method property: currentState # This must hold an array supports: - App\Entity\ExpenseReport initial_marking: draft places: - draft - review_pool - approved_pool - ready_for_payment - rejected transitions: submit: from: draft to: - place: review_pool weight: 3 # <--- OUTPUT WEIGHT approve: from: review_pool to: approved_pool # Default weight is 1. One 'review_pool' token becomes one 'approved_pool' token. reject: from: review_pool to: rejected # If rejected, we might want to clear all tokens, # but for simplicity, one rejection moves to rejected. finalize: from: - place: approved_pool weight: 3 # <--- INPUT WEIGHT to: ready_for_payment
We need an entity that supports this “Multi-State” marking store. The currentState property must be an array to hold the token counts (e.g., [‘reviewpool’ => 2, ‘approvedpool’ => 1]).
namespace App\Entity; use App\Repository\ExpenseReportRepository; use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping as ORM; #[ORM\Entity(repositoryClass: ExpenseReportRepository::class)] class ExpenseReport { #[ORM\Id] #[ORM\GeneratedValue] #[ORM\Column] private ?int $id = null; #[ORM\Column(length: 255)] private string $description; #[ORM\Column] private float $amount; /** * Stores the workflow state. * For Weighted Workflows, this stores the places and their quantities. * Example DB content: {"review_pool": 2, "approved_pool": 1} */ #[ORM\Column(type: 'json')] private array $currentState = []; public function __construct(string $description, float $amount) { $this->description = $description; $this->amount = $amount; // Initial marking is handled by the workflow component, // but initializing to empty array is good practice. } public function getId(): ?int { return $this->id; } public function getDescription(): string { return $this->description; } public function getAmount(): float { return $this->amount; } public function getCurrentState(): array { return $this->currentState; } public function setCurrentState(array $currentState): self { $this->currentState = $currentState; return $this; } }
\ Run the migration:
php bin/console make:migration php bin/console doctrine:migrations:migrate
To interact with this workflow cleanly, we should create a service. This service will handle the logic of “who” is approving, though for this tutorial, we will focus on the workflow mechanics.
namespace App\Service; use App\Entity\ExpenseReport; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\WorkflowInterface; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Registry; readonly class ExpenseManager { public function __construct( private Registry $workflowRegistry, ) {} public function submit(ExpenseReport $expense): void { $workflow = $this->getWorkflow($expense); if ($workflow->can($expense, 'submit')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'submit'); } else { throw new \LogicException('Cannot submit this expense report.'); } } public function approve(ExpenseReport $expense): void { $workflow = $this->getWorkflow($expense); // In a real app, you would check "Is the current user one of the allowed approvers?" here. if ($workflow->can($expense, 'approve')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); // Check if we can auto-finalize (if 3 approvals are met) if ($workflow->can($expense, 'finalize')) { $workflow->apply($expense, 'finalize'); } } else { throw new \LogicException('Approval not needed or not allowed.'); } } public function getStatus(ExpenseReport $expense): array { // returns something like ['review_pool' => 2, 'approved_pool' => 1] return $expense->getCurrentState(); } private function getWorkflow(ExpenseReport $expense): WorkflowInterface { return $this->workflowRegistry->get($expense, 'expense_approval'); } }
Notice the approve method. After applying approve, we immediately check can($expense, ‘finalize’).
Before testing, it is incredibly helpful to visualize the graph, especially with weights involved. Symfony provides a dumper command.
php bin/console workflow:dump expense_approval | dot -Tpng -o workflow.png
\ You need graphviz installed on your machine to use dot. If you don’t have it, you can paste the text output into an online Graphviz viewer.
\ The output will visually represent the arrows with labels like weight: 3, making it clear that the submit transition spawns multiple tokens.
We don’t just hope it works; we prove it. We will use a KernelTestCase to load the actual workflow configuration and test the transitions.
//tests/Workflow/ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest.php namespace App\Tests\Workflow; use App\Entity\ExpenseReport; use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Test\KernelTestCase; use Symfony\Component\Workflow\WorkflowInterface; class ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest extends KernelTestCase { private WorkflowInterface $workflow; protected function setUp(): void { self::bootKernel(); $container = static::getContainer(); $registry = $container->get('workflow.registry'); // We create a dummy subject to get the workflow // In a real app, passing the class name to the registry is preferred if supported, // or fetching by name directly if you have a custom service alias. $subject = new ExpenseReport('Test', 100.0); $this->workflow = $registry->get($subject, 'expense_approval'); } public function testWeightedApprovalFlow(): void { $expense = new ExpenseReport('MacBook Pro', 3000.00); // 1. Initial State $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'submit')); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'submit'); // Verify tokens: Should be in review_pool 3 times $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertArrayHasKey('review_pool', $marking); $this->assertEquals(3, $marking['review_pool'], 'Should have 3 pending reviews'); // 2. First Approval $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'approve')); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertEquals(2, $marking['review_pool']); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['approved_pool']); // Check that we CANNOT finalize yet (need 3 approvals) $this->assertFalse($this->workflow->can($expense, 'finalize'), 'Should not finalize with only 1 approval'); // 3. Second Approval $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['review_pool']); $this->assertEquals(2, $marking['approved_pool']); // 4. Third Approval $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'approve'); $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); // At this specific moment, review_pool is 0, approved_pool is 3 $this->assertEquals(0, $marking['review_pool'] ?? 0); $this->assertEquals(3, $marking['approved_pool']); // 5. Finalize $this->assertTrue($this->workflow->can($expense, 'finalize'), 'Should be able to finalize now'); $this->workflow->apply($expense, 'finalize'); // 6. Verify End State $marking = $expense->getCurrentState(); $this->assertArrayHasKey('ready_for_payment', $marking); $this->assertEquals(1, $marking['ready_for_payment']); // Previous tokens should be consumed $this->assertArrayNotHasKey('approved_pool', $marking); } }
\ Run the test:
php bin/phpunit tests/Workflow/ExpenseApprovalWorkflowTest.php
Symfony 7.4 also adds support for Backed Enums in workflows. Instead of hardcoding strings like ‘review_pool’, you should define an Enum.
namespace App\Enum; enum ExpenseState: string { case DRAFT = 'draft'; case REVIEW_POOL = 'review_pool'; case APPROVED_POOL = 'approved_pool'; case READY = 'ready_for_payment'; case REJECTED = 'rejected'; }
You can then update your workflow.yaml (though YAML still uses strings, your PHP code can use ExpenseState::REVIEW_POOL->value).
You might want to prevent the same person from approving 3 times. Weighted transitions allow the transition approve to be called 3 times, but the workflow engine doesn’t inherently know who called it.
\ To solve this, use a Guard Listener.
#[AsEventListener('workflow.expense_approval.guard.approve')] public function preventDoubleApproval(GuardEvent $event): void { /** @var ExpenseReport $expense */ $expense = $event->getSubject(); $user = $this->security->getUser(); // Imagine the entity has a list of who already approved if ($expense->hasApproved($user)) { $event->setBlocked(true, 'You have already approved this expense.'); } }
One challenge with weighted tokens is cleanup. If we have 2 approvals and the 3rd person calls reject, what happens to the 2 tokens sitting in approved_pool?
\ In a standard workflow, moving to rejected might leave those approved_pool tokens straggling (creating a zombie state where the report is both Rejected and Partially Approved).
\ The reject transition should ideally consume all tokens. However, dynamic consumption isn’t supported purely in YAML (you can’t say “consume ALL”).
\ Using an Event Subscriber on workflow.entered.rejected, you can manually reset the marking store.
public function onRejected(Event $event): void { $expense = $event->getSubject(); // Force reset state to ONLY rejected $expense->setCurrentState(['rejected' => 1]); }
Symfony 7.4’s Weighted Workflow Transitions bridge the gap between simple state management and complex Petri net logic. By allowing multiple instances of a state (tokens) to exist simultaneously, we can now model voting systems, manufacturing assembly lines, and batch processing logic directly in the configuration, drastically reducing the amount of custom PHP boilerplate required.
\ Key Takeaways:
\ This feature solidifies Symfony’s Workflow component as the premier PHP solution for state management, allowing you to delete fragile “counter” properties and rely on a mathematically sound architecture.
Adopting these advanced patterns can significantly simplify your domain logic, but the transition isn’t always obvious. If you are looking to modernize your Symfony stack, need a second pair of eyes on your architecture, or just want to geek out over the latest Petri net implementations, I’d love to hear from you.
\ Let’s be in touch — connect with me on LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-mochalkin/) to continue the conversation on modern PHP architecture.


