The post Expert Reveals What Bitcoin Needs To Win in 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s (BTC) momentum has sharply reversed in the fourth quarterThe post Expert Reveals What Bitcoin Needs To Win in 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s (BTC) momentum has sharply reversed in the fourth quarter

Expert Reveals What Bitcoin Needs To Win in 2026

2025/12/12 01:23

Bitcoin’s (BTC) momentum has sharply reversed in the fourth quarter. While analysts expected the coin to set new highs, many now doubt whether BTC can even reclaim its previous peak. Forecasts are being revised downward as performance weakens.

This downturn comes despite a supportive macro environment. Demand is cooling, market strength is fading, and confidence appears to be eroding. So what changed? BeInCrypto spoke with Ryan Chow, Co-Founder of Solv Protocol, to unpack the shift in investor behavior and explore what Bitcoin will need to win 2026.

How Bitcoin Attracted and Lost Institutional Demand in 2025 

Historically, the fourth quarter has been Bitcoin’s strongest, delivering an average return of 77.26%. Expectations for 2025 were even more ambitious as institutional adoption accelerated and a growing number of public companies added Bitcoin to their reserves. 

Sponsored

Sponsored

Instead, the market reversed course. Bitcoin is down 20.69% so far in Q4, defying what has traditionally been its most favorable period. 

Bitcoin Returns in Every Quarter. Source: Coinglass

According to Chow, early 2025 was defined by institutional onboarding. 

However, by late 2025, the environment had shifted. Chow revealed that structural buyers had already built their positions, forcing Bitcoin to compete directly with rising real yields. 

Once the cryptocurrency stopped posting new highs, chief investment officers began to question the rationale for holding a non-yielding asset when T-bills, corporate credit, and even AI-driven equities offer returns simply for staying invested.

Moreover, the executive highlighted that Bitcoin’s market structure has shifted. After the ETF and halving trades, Bitcoin transitioned into an overcrowded macro position. He noted that the asset has transitioned from the structural repricing phase into a carry-and-basis environment, now dominated by professional traders. 

The straightforward “ETF plus halving equals number go up”  thesis has effectively run its course. According to him, the next phase of adoption will be driven by demonstrable utility and risk-adjusted yield. He told BeInCrypto that,

Sponsored

Sponsored

Bitcoin, often referred to as digital gold, has long been promoted as an inflation hedge. Chow acknowledged that the asset will likely retain its identity as a store of value. However, he stressed that this narrative alone is no longer sufficient for institutional investors.

Expert Reveals Bitcoin’s Key To Winning Back Institutions in 2026

Chow cautioned that the market may be significantly underestimating the scale of macroeconomic changes in 2026. He argued that unless Bitcoin evolves into a form of productive capital, it will remain a cyclical, liquidity-dependent asset. 

In that scenario, institutions would view and treat it precisely as such, rather than as a strategic long-term allocation.

So what safe, regulated yield products would bring institutions back in 2026? Chow pointed out that the real sweet spot lies in regulated, cash-plus Bitcoin strategies that resemble traditional investment products, featuring clear legal wrappers, audited reserves, and straightforward risk profiles.

He outlined three categories:

  • Bitcoin-backed cash-plus funds: BTC held in qualified custody and deployed into on-chain Treasury bill or repo strategies, targeting an incremental 2 to 4% yield.
  • Over-collateralised BTC lending and repo: Regulated vehicles lending against Bitcoin to high-quality borrowers. On-chain monitoring, conservative LTVs, and bankruptcy-remote structures will support this.
  • Defined-outcome option overlays: Strategies such as covered calls, wrapped in familiar regulatory frameworks like UCITS or 40-Act vehicles.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Across all of them, several requirements remain non-negotiable. These include regulated managers, segregated accounts, proof-of-reserves, and compatibility with existing institutional custody infrastructure.

He further emphasized that institutions do not need 20% DeFi APY, which is often a red flag. A net annualized return of 2 to 5%, achieved through transparent and collateralized strategies, is sufficient to move Bitcoin from a “nice to have” to a “core reserve asset.”

What Bitcoin Yield Looks Like in Practice 

Chow detailed that Bitcoin’s transformation into productive capital would shift it from a static gold bar to high-quality collateral capable of funding T-bills, credit, and liquidity across multiple venues. In this model, corporates pledge BTC into regulated on-chain vaults, receive yield-bearing claims in return, and maintain a clear line-of-sight to underlying assets. 

Bitcoin would also serve as collateral in repo markets, as margin for derivatives, and as backing for structured notes, supporting both on-chain investment strategies and off-chain working capital needs.

The result is a multi-purpose instrument: Bitcoin as a reserve asset, a funding asset, and a yield-generating asset simultaneously. It mirrors the function Treasuries serve today, but operates within a global, 24/7, programmable environment.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Institutions Want Yield: Can Bitcoin Provide It Without Compromising Its Principles? 

While the applications are quite compelling, the question arises: can Bitcoin support regulated, risk-adjusted yield at scale without compromising its foundational principles?

According to Chow, the answer is yes, provided the market respects Bitcoin’s layered architecture. 

The executive acknowledged that several technical challenges must be addressed. He emphasized that the ecosystem must evolve from trusted multisig setups to institution-grade bridging. Furthermore, it should establish standardised one-to-one-backed wrappers and develop real-time risk oracles. 

Ultimately, Chow’s message is clear: Bitcoin’s next phase will be defined not by narrative or speculation, but by disciplined financial engineering. If the industry can deliver transparent, regulated, yield-bearing structures without compromising Bitcoin’s core principles, institutions will return, not as momentum traders, but as long-term allocators. 

The path to 2026 runs through utility, credibility, and Bitcoin, demonstrating its ability to compete in a world where capital demands productivity.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/key-to-bitcoin-success-in-2026/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

US-based crypto exchange Coinbase has made a significant appeal to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a wave of lawsuits aimed at its operations. The company is urging federal action to address what it describes as an “increasingly fragmented and hostile” regulatory landscape for the crypto market. Coinbase Urges Federal Action  In a recent letter, Coinbase highlighted the steps taken by the current Administration to create a more equitable framework for digital asset regulation. This includes the introduction of stablecoin legislation and two pending bipartisan market-structure bills aimed at fostering uniformity in the oversight of cryptocurrencies.  Coinbase argues that these initiatives have begun to mitigate the adverse effects of the previous Administration’s enforcement-driven regulatory approach.  However, the company warns that certain states are perpetuating this problematic trend by adopting “expansive and flawed” interpretations of securities laws and implementing new licensing requirements that undermine the federal government’s pro-innovation stance. Related Reading: REX Shares Claims Its DOGE And XRP Spot ETFs Will Be Approved By US SEC Tomorrow They make an example with the Oregon Attorney General, who has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, claiming that many digital assets traded on its platform qualify as alleged unregistered securities.  The letter affirms that the suit not only targets Coinbase but also encourages other states to address what the Attorney General perceives as a regulatory gap left by federal authorities.  Similarly, the New York Attorney General has initiated legal action to regulate transactions involving digital assets based on decentralized protocols as securities, further complicating the regulatory environment. Coinbase has faced cease-and-desist orders from four states, which demand the company halt its retail staking services. These orders are deemed by Coinbase as “legally unfounded and inconsistent.” Unified Framework For Digital Assets In light of these challenges, the letter to the DOJ calls for urgent federal intervention to establish broad preemption provisions. The crypto exchange argues that preemption has historically been an effective tool for addressing state interference in national markets, referencing past Congressional actions. Coinbase contends that the current patchwork of state regulations not only disrupts market efficiency but also leads to unequal access to cryptocurrency services based on geographic location. Related Reading: Citi’s Ethereum Forecast: No New All-Time High Expected, Year-End Target At $4,300 To remedy these issues, Coinbase advocates for Congress to adopt legislation that would exempt federally regulated digital assets from state blue-sky laws and clarify that state licensing requirements do not apply to crypto intermediaries.  Additionally, the company urges the SEC to expedite rulemaking and provide clearer guidance on why digital asset transactions and services, including staking, should not be classified as securities. Such clarity would help prevent states from imposing conflicting regulations based on their interpretations of securities laws. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 15:00