LOSSES due to “ghost” or non-existent flood control projects were estimated at P180 billion since 2016, Senator Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson, who heads the Senate committee probing anomalous projects, claimed on Wednesday. “We are looking at 30,000 flood control projects since 2016. If we extrapolate based on earlier findings that more than 600 out of […]LOSSES due to “ghost” or non-existent flood control projects were estimated at P180 billion since 2016, Senator Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson, who heads the Senate committee probing anomalous projects, claimed on Wednesday. “We are looking at 30,000 flood control projects since 2016. If we extrapolate based on earlier findings that more than 600 out of […]

P180B likely lost to ‘ghost’ projects since 2016, senator says

2025/12/03 21:25

LOSSES due to “ghost” or non-existent flood control projects were estimated at P180 billion since 2016, Senator Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson, who heads the Senate committee probing anomalous projects, claimed on Wednesday.

“We are looking at 30,000 flood control projects since 2016. If we extrapolate based on earlier findings that more than 600 out of 10,000 projects were ghost, we estimated that 6% or higher of 30,000 projects could mean P180 billion or higher went to ghost projects,” he said in a statement.

He added that the estimates were based on the 10,000 flood control projects inspected so far, which found that about 600 of them were nonexistent.

“Imagine, we likely lost P180 billion to ghost projects, and we have not yet started counting our losses to substandard projects,” Mr. Lacson added.

He said that the estimates had rendered the number of projects tackled by the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee as “minuscule.”

“The Blue Ribbon Committee remains ready to help relevant agencies like the Independent Commission for Infrastructure, Department of Justice and Office of the Ombudsman in pursuing charges against those involved, if it gets new information,” Mr. Lacson said. 

The committee has been investigating kickbacks involving multibillion-peso flood control projects, following reports that lawmakers and public officials benefited from infrastructure funds allocated since 2022.

The senator added that the Senate and the House of Representatives have agreed to simplify the bicameral conference committee (bicam) that would only tackle the disagreeing provisions of the budget bill.

“This will be simpler and more transparent and that is our intention. In the bicam, we will ensure transparency, all the way to the bill being enrolled,” Mr. Lacson said.

Malacañang announced earlier that the bicameral conference committee meetings will be livestreamed, following public calls for more transparency and accountability in the budget process. 

DPWH ‘GHOST’ PROJECTS
Meanwhile, the Commission on Audit (CoA) flagged the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) after some regional offices declared nearly P2 billion worth of infrastructure projects as accomplished nationwide despite the works not being completed in 2024.

State auditors gave a qualified opinion on the DPWH’s financial report due to “aggregate uncorrected misstatements” involving the agency’s billions of pesos worth of infrastructure, including P1.95 billion of projects marked as completed despite unfinished work.

“Some DPWH offices reported 100% project accomplishments in the Report on Publicized Government Programs, Projects and Activities,” CoA said in its 2024 audit report.

“However, ocular inspection and validation of the actual physical status revealed that these projects were not completed within the contract time due to defects, deficiencies requiring repairs and unfinished pay or work items,” it added.

Public Works Secretary Vivencio B. Dizon did not immediately reply to a Viber message seeking comment.

The DPWH has come under tighter scrutiny following allegations that flood control projects were tied to a multibillion‑peso kickback scheme involving politicians, officials and government contractors.

The projects, which auditors flagged as inaccurately tagged as finished, were found nationwide, with engineering offices in the Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR), Mimaropa, Western Visayas, and Northern Mindanao among those cited.

CoA also flagged that DPWH paid the “final progress billings” of 48 projects totaling P2.18 billion despite unfinished work or defects.

In CAR, the full amount of P1.3 billion was paid for 29 projects that were “not yet fully completed due to unfinished works.”

“On the other hand, it was noted in Region 3 that final payments on seven projects and the release of retention money for two projects were already made,” state auditors said, referring to 19 projects totaling P876.29 billion that faced completion delays. “The payment could be deemed ‘irregular.’”

CoA urged the DPWH to refrain from releasing project completion payments for projects not yet completed or “satisfactorily implemented.”

“Require contractors to immediately rectify or complete noted deficiencies and deliver all contractual requirements; otherwise forfeit their performance securities and consider them for blacklisting, if warranted,” state auditors said. — Adrian H. Halili and Kenneth Christiane L. Basilio

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

Volante Technologies Customers Successfully Navigate Critical Regulatory Deadlines for EU SEPA Instant and Global SWIFT Cross-Border Payments

PaaS leader ensures seamless migrations and uninterrupted payment operations LONDON–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Volante Technologies, the global leader in Payments as a Service
Share
AI Journal2025/12/16 17:16
Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut

In a significant pivot, the Federal Reserve reduced its benchmark interest rate following a prolonged ten-month hiatus. This decision, reflecting a strategic response to the current economic climate, has captured attention across financial sectors, with both market participants and policymakers keenly evaluating its potential impact.Continue Reading:Fed Acts on Economic Signals with Rate Cut
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:28
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00