The post Ethereum’s peer-to-peer backbone faces open-source funding gap appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shipyard, a key maintainer of libp2p — the peer-to-peer networking stack underpinning Ethereum and dozens of other networks — will cease support for its Go and JavaScript implementations by Sept. 30, citing resource constraints.  In a blog post, the team confirmed it is “working to transition stewardship to the community.” Libp2p is the backbone of Ethereum’s peer-to-peer networking layer, providing the protocol suite that consensus clients use to discover peers, exchange messages, and propagate blocks and attestations across the network. Ethereum clients rely on libp2p’s Gossipsub pub/sub protocol to rapidly broadcast new blocks and validator votes, a process that must complete within strict slot deadlines to keep the chain running smoothly. The status quo is “against good engineering practice,” according to MIT professor and Optimum co-founder Muriel Médard, who has developed a drop-in, API-compatible replacement for Gossipsub, called OptimumP2P (mumP2P). “The thing is, if you hardwire something that does not need to be hardwired, you create fragility and dependence,” Médard told Blockworks. Tea Protocol presents one possible answer to funding conundrums such as this, within the open-source software community. Tea is a blockchain-based system that maps open-source dependencies, ranks projects by criticality, and routes token rewards and security bounties to maintainers to ensure long-term, sustainable support, per Tea co-founder Max Howell, creator of Homebrew. While the ecosystems that rely on libp2p are mobilizing around a transition for the software, in the short term there’s a risk of a slowdown in triaging bugs or security issues, amid the loss of Shipyard’s institutional knowledge. “The incentives aren’t really there for open source maintainers to care enough about security,” Howell told Blockworks, noting that, today, open-source software is more than “a public good,” and rather “fundamental infrastructure.” Timothy Lewis, Tea’s co-founder, said libp2p “sits in what we consider the protocol ranking graph —… The post Ethereum’s peer-to-peer backbone faces open-source funding gap appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shipyard, a key maintainer of libp2p — the peer-to-peer networking stack underpinning Ethereum and dozens of other networks — will cease support for its Go and JavaScript implementations by Sept. 30, citing resource constraints.  In a blog post, the team confirmed it is “working to transition stewardship to the community.” Libp2p is the backbone of Ethereum’s peer-to-peer networking layer, providing the protocol suite that consensus clients use to discover peers, exchange messages, and propagate blocks and attestations across the network. Ethereum clients rely on libp2p’s Gossipsub pub/sub protocol to rapidly broadcast new blocks and validator votes, a process that must complete within strict slot deadlines to keep the chain running smoothly. The status quo is “against good engineering practice,” according to MIT professor and Optimum co-founder Muriel Médard, who has developed a drop-in, API-compatible replacement for Gossipsub, called OptimumP2P (mumP2P). “The thing is, if you hardwire something that does not need to be hardwired, you create fragility and dependence,” Médard told Blockworks. Tea Protocol presents one possible answer to funding conundrums such as this, within the open-source software community. Tea is a blockchain-based system that maps open-source dependencies, ranks projects by criticality, and routes token rewards and security bounties to maintainers to ensure long-term, sustainable support, per Tea co-founder Max Howell, creator of Homebrew. While the ecosystems that rely on libp2p are mobilizing around a transition for the software, in the short term there’s a risk of a slowdown in triaging bugs or security issues, amid the loss of Shipyard’s institutional knowledge. “The incentives aren’t really there for open source maintainers to care enough about security,” Howell told Blockworks, noting that, today, open-source software is more than “a public good,” and rather “fundamental infrastructure.” Timothy Lewis, Tea’s co-founder, said libp2p “sits in what we consider the protocol ranking graph —…

Ethereum’s peer-to-peer backbone faces open-source funding gap

2025/09/20 01:18

Shipyard, a key maintainer of libp2p — the peer-to-peer networking stack underpinning Ethereum and dozens of other networks — will cease support for its Go and JavaScript implementations by Sept. 30, citing resource constraints. 

In a blog post, the team confirmed it is “working to transition stewardship to the community.”

Libp2p is the backbone of Ethereum’s peer-to-peer networking layer, providing the protocol suite that consensus clients use to discover peers, exchange messages, and propagate blocks and attestations across the network. Ethereum clients rely on libp2p’s Gossipsub pub/sub protocol to rapidly broadcast new blocks and validator votes, a process that must complete within strict slot deadlines to keep the chain running smoothly.

The status quo is “against good engineering practice,” according to MIT professor and Optimum co-founder Muriel Médard, who has developed a drop-in, API-compatible replacement for Gossipsub, called OptimumP2P (mumP2P).

“The thing is, if you hardwire something that does not need to be hardwired, you create fragility and dependence,” Médard told Blockworks.

Tea Protocol presents one possible answer to funding conundrums such as this, within the open-source software community. Tea is a blockchain-based system that maps open-source dependencies, ranks projects by criticality, and routes token rewards and security bounties to maintainers to ensure long-term, sustainable support, per Tea co-founder Max Howell, creator of Homebrew.

While the ecosystems that rely on libp2p are mobilizing around a transition for the software, in the short term there’s a risk of a slowdown in triaging bugs or security issues, amid the loss of Shipyard’s institutional knowledge.

“The incentives aren’t really there for open source maintainers to care enough about security,” Howell told Blockworks, noting that, today, open-source software is more than “a public good,” and rather “fundamental infrastructure.”

Timothy Lewis, Tea’s co-founder, said libp2p “sits in what we consider the protocol ranking graph — the layer of active protocols and standards that underpin ecosystems like Ethereum.”

Tea tracks the relative importance of code through a system called tea rank, based on package manager data, and is now “leaning into graphing those protocols” as well, Lewis added.

Alternatives brewing

Optimum’s alternative, mumP2P, provides a libp2p-like pub-sub interface while using Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) to remove Gossipsub’s redundancy and latency.

Médard said Gossipsub “slows down under stress,” and that propagation bottlenecks are now a key limiter for Ethereum scaling. By contrast, mumP2P is able to send “equations” rather than repeated messages, resulting in much lower latency — though it’s still in testing.

For now, libp2p’s future hinges on a new wave of community maintainers, including those from within crypto. Whether protocols like Tea can deliver durable funding for unglamorous maintenance work remains to be seen.  

“Our mainnet is just around the corner,” Lewis said. “This is how we ensure the protocols at the heart of Web3 aren’t left behind, but are sustainably supported for the long term.”


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Source: https://blockworks.co/news/ethereums-peer-to-peer-backbone

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP volume daalt 32 procent: wat dit betekent voor richting, marktreactie en scenario’s

XRP volume daalt 32 procent: wat dit betekent voor richting, marktreactie en scenario’s

Het handelsvolume van XRP is in korte tijd met ruim 32 procent teruggevallen, precies op het moment dat de markt te maken heeft met verhoogde volatiliteit door ETF-instromen, macro-onzekerheid en toenemende verkoopdruk onder grote holders. Voor actieve crypto-investeerders is een dergelijke volume beweging nooit zomaar een datapunt. Volume vertelt namelijk veel over de richting van het sentiment, de kracht van een trend en de kans op mogelijke trend omkeringen. Check onze Discord Connect met "like-minded" crypto enthousiastelingen Leer gratis de basis van Bitcoin & trading - stap voor stap, zonder voorkennis. Krijg duidelijke uitleg & charts van ervaren analisten. Sluit je aan bij een community die samen groeit. Nu naar Discord Wat zegt een volume daling over de koers richting? Een daling van 32 procent betekent dat er minder kapitaal stroomt, waardoor prijsbewegingen sneller kunnen doorschieten. Wanneer volume daalt terwijl de koers zelf al matig is, wijst dat vaak op een afnemende koopdrang en een markt die moeite heeft om belangrijke niveaus te holden. Daarbij speelt mee dat XRP recent meerdere support niveaus verloor, waaronder de wekelijkse voortschrijdende gemiddelde lijn. Indicatoren zoals MACD en RSI wijzen op verzwakkend momentum. In combinatie met dalend volume ontstaat een klassiek bearish momentum, namelijk lagere highs, lagere lows, minder grote liquiditeit en weinig interesse om agressief bij te kopen. Hoe reageert de markt op de daling qua volume? De markt reageerde vooral defensief. De fear nam toe, mede door bredere druk vanuit Bitcoin-ETF-uitstromen en een lage lezing van de Fear and Greed Index. XRP werd harder geraakt dan de gemiddelde altcoin, mede doordat whales in de dagen voorafgaand aan de uitbraak naar beneden al bijna 200 miljoen XRP verkochten. Deze verkoopdruk zorgde voor extra liquiditeitsproblemen. Whales dumped nearly 200 million $XRP in just 48 hours! pic.twitter.com/4qObRnDE0X — Ali (@ali_charts) November 16, 2025 Ook de timing speelt een rol. Terwijl de eerste ETF’s in de VS live gingen bleef het handelsvolume achter bij de verwachtingen. Analisten merkten op dat deze nauwelijks zichtbaar waren in de dagelijkse handelscijfers. Dat zorgde voor teleurstelling bij traders die rekenden op directe ETF-gedreven liquiditeit. Mogelijke scenario’s voor de komende weken De volume decline maakt de komende weken cruciaal voor XRP. Er zijn komende periode drie scenario’s mogelijk, namelijk de volgende mogelijkheden. Bron: TradingView Verdere daling richting de $1.80 Als het volume laag blijft en whales blijven afbouwen, kunnen verkopers opnieuw actief worden. Een flush richting het belangrijke gebied rond $1.55 is dan niet uitgesloten. Dit scenario speelt vooral wanneer Bitcoin onder druk blijft en ETF-uitstromen aanhouden de komende periode. Stabilisatie boven de $2 Wanneer short-term sellers uitgeput raken, kan de $2 opnieuw dienen als evenwichtspunt. Stabilisatie vereist dat volume terugkeert en dat buyers weer bereid zijn liquiditeit op te nemen. Vooral institutionele instromen via nieuwe ETF’s kunnen hierbij een rol spelen zodra de markt tot rust komt. Herstelscenario bij terugkeer van liquiditeit Het meest optimistische scenario draait om toenemende ETF-instromen, vergelijkbaar met wat bij Bitcoin gebeurde na zijn eerste spot-ETF-lancering. Toen volgde eerst een stevige daling, maar daarna een sterke rally toen ETF-aanbieders lage niveaus gebruikten om te accumuleren. Nederlandse exchange met web3 wallet OKX - trade meer dan 150 crypto’s Nieuwe app en Web3 wallet in Nederland Handel met andere traders Verdien bonussen met crypto staking OKX review Koop XRP op OKX! Let op: cryptocurrency is een zeer volatiele en ongereguleerde investering. Doe je eigen onderzoek. Het bericht XRP volume daalt 32 procent: wat dit betekent voor richting, marktreactie en scenario’s is geschreven door Timo Bruinsel en verscheen als eerst op Bitcoinmagazine.nl.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/21 01:31
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28