Lawmakers negotiating the Senate stablecoin legislation have reached an agreement in principle on the stablecoin yield issue, the single provision that came closestLawmakers negotiating the Senate stablecoin legislation have reached an agreement in principle on the stablecoin yield issue, the single provision that came closest

Senate Stablecoin Talks Reached a Breakthrough – Yield Question That Nearly Killed the Bill Has Been Resolved

2026/03/21 20:14
4 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo crypto.news@mexc.com.

Lawmakers negotiating the Senate stablecoin legislation have reached an agreement in principle on the stablecoin yield issue, the single provision that came closest to collapsing the broader bill when Coinbase withdrew its support in January and forced the cancellation of a scheduled markup session.

What the Agreement Covers

The stablecoin yield question centers on whether issuers can offer holders a return on their stablecoin balances. Traditional bank lobbyists have pushed back aggressively against any structure that would allow stablecoins to function as yield-bearing instruments, arguing it would create direct competition with insured bank deposits without equivalent regulatory oversight. Crypto industry participants, including Coinbase, argued that prohibiting yield entirely would cripple the competitiveness of U.S.-regulated stablecoins against offshore alternatives that already offer returns.

According to The Block, the agreement in principle represents a middle position between those two pressures. As covered in earlier reporting this week, Senator Lummis had indicated the new bill language would avoid banking product terminology and prohibit rewards that are economically equivalent to traditional deposit yields. The breakthrough announced now suggests that formulation has found sufficient support among the relevant stakeholders to move forward.

Why This Matters for the April Timeline

Senator Lummis set a late April markup vote in the Senate Banking Committee as the target following the Easter recess. Senator Bernie Moreno attached a harder deadline to that target, warning that if the bill does not pass by May it likely will not pass for the foreseeable future given the 2026 midterm election calendar consuming legislative bandwidth in the second half of the year.

The stablecoin yield impasse was the specific obstacle most likely to prevent the April timeline from holding. The January markup cancellation after Coinbase’s withdrawal demonstrated what happens when a major industry stakeholder is not satisfied with the yield language. An agreement in principle reached before the April session gives negotiators time to finalize the exact legislative text rather than arriving at the markup with unresolved fundamental disagreements.

The Democratic Party’s majority in the Senate Banking Committee means the bill cannot pass markup on Republican support alone. The yield compromise needs to hold across party lines, not just among crypto-friendly lawmakers. An agreement in principle is the necessary precondition for that broader coalition. It is not itself the coalition.

World’s Largest Hardware Wallet Maker Is Going Public and Made Important Hire

What Remains Unresolved

An agreement in principle is not enacted legislation. The distance between a conceptual agreement among negotiators and final bill text that survives markup, full Senate vote, reconciliation with the House-passed Clarity Act, and a presidential signature involves multiple additional stages where the compromise can fray.

The DeFi provisions that also contributed to Coinbase’s January withdrawal have been described by Lummis as put to bed. Whether that assessment holds when the full committee membership reviews the complete bill text is a separate question from whether the yield language has been resolved between the primary negotiating parties.

The regulatory context has shifted materially in favor of the bill’s passage since January. The SEC and CFTC joint guidance issued this week formally classifying major digital assets as commodities removed a layer of jurisdictional ambiguity that previously made the market structure bill’s passage more urgent but also more contested. A clearer regulatory baseline makes the legislative negotiation less fraught without making it simple.

The April markup remains the proximate milestone. The agreement in principle on yield makes that milestone more reachable than it was a week ago. Whether it holds depends on what the final language actually says when the text is published.

The post Senate Stablecoin Talks Reached a Breakthrough – Yield Question That Nearly Killed the Bill Has Been Resolved appeared first on ETHNews.

Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta crypto.news@mexc.com per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.