President Donald Trump insulted California Governor Gavin Newsom for his dyslexia in a comment that exacerbates tensions between his administration and the neurodivergentPresident Donald Trump insulted California Governor Gavin Newsom for his dyslexia in a comment that exacerbates tensions between his administration and the neurodivergent

'Should not have learning disabilities': How Trump uses ableism to insult his foes

2026/03/17 08:31
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

President Donald Trump insulted California Governor Gavin Newsom for his dyslexia in a comment that exacerbates tensions between his administration and the neurodivergent community.

Describing Newsom as a “low-IQ person” while talking with reporters in the White House on Monday, Trump said that “Gavin ‘Newscum’ has admitted that he is a — that he has learning disabilities. Honestly, I’m all for people with learning disabilities, but not for my president. I don’t want — I think a president should not have learning disabilities, OK?”

Later, appearing to reference Newsom admitting he got a 960 on her SATs, Trump said “I know it’s highly controversial to say such a horrible thing. The president of the United States, Gavin Newscum, admitted that he has learning disabilities, dyslexia. Everything about him is dumb.”

Dyslexia is a neurological condition that makes it difficult for those with it to read, write and spell, regardless of their intelligence. It is part of a larger umbrella of neurological differences including autism, ADHD, OCD, bipolar disorder and other diagnoses known as “neurodiversity.”

“Learning disabilities do not preclude anyone from running for or assuming elected office,” Haley Moss, the first openly autistic female Florida lawyer and a neurodiversity advocate, told AlterNet. “Neurodivergent people are competent and can hold office or any job they'd like as long as they have the right supports and qualifications. In fact, we have also had other politicians and elected officials who also had dyslexia or were otherwise neurodivergent.”

One of those dyslexic politicians is a former president, Woodrow Wilson, who historians believe was dyslexic based on descriptions of him from childhood. He could not learn to read until he was twelve and was a slow reader throughout his life. Despite these hardships, Wilson is the only president to have earned a PhD, excelling as a historian and professor at Princeton before becoming university president and governor of New Jersey.

“People with disabilities are one of the largest minority groups in the U.S. today, and excluding us by making ableist attacks on intelligence ends up harming more people than likely anticipated,” Moss told AlterNet. “Further, the notion of ‘IQ’ is ableist in itself. IQ tests do not measure intelligence adequately and have roots in eugenics.”

This is also true. Speaking with this journalist for Salon in 2024, Harvard University research professor and psychologist Dr. Howard Gardner explained that the public perception of IQ tests is disproportionate to their actual scientific utility.

“If you and I were parents, and we wanted to know how our kid would do, the IQ test does as well as anything else you can do in 15 minutes or an hour,” Gardner told Salon. “But at schools, where AI [artificial intelligence] will be much more important every month, the less good an instrument we have [in IQ tests]. We need to develop different ways of assessing people's intelligence or talents.”

He added that he explains to colleagues “We all use the word ‘smart’, but if you're trying to decide whether somebody in physics should get tenure, you're going to have entirely different criteria then when it's somebody who's teaching Shakespeare or Homer.”

Even before Trump’s comment regarding Newsom, the president and key administration officials have been repeatedly criticized for their seeming insensitivity to neurodiversity issues. Speaking with this journalist for Salon in 2025, Dr. Eliza Barach, a cognitive psychologist and ADHD coach and consultant, said that “scientific evidence shows these [neurodivergent] conditions are not ‘threats’ but rather neurological differences that can lead to positive outcomes when given appropriate support.” Barack was responding to comments by Trump’s then-new Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who pathologized autism, slashed social programs on which neurodivergent people rely and purged initiatives related to diversity, equity and inclusion.

“While individuals with ADHD/autism face unique challenges, they can thrive when their traits are properly understood and supported,” Barach told Salon at the time. “The true threat is in failing to recognize and support neurodivergent folks,” and she later pointed out that “research has revealed that these neurotypes often come with distinct strengths, including exceptional pattern recognition, hyperfocus abilities, creative problem-solving, and innovative thinking.”

Trump later doubled down on this pseudoscience regarding neurodiversity, most conspicuously last year when Trump falsely claimed women who take Tylenol while pregnant are more likely to give birth to autistic children. Kennedy later also made the inaccurate claim that “children who are circumcised early have double the rate of autism, and it’s highly likely because they’re given Tylenol.”

Trump chimed in, “There’s a tremendous amount of proof or evidence. I would say as a non‑doctor, but I’ve studied this a long time.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

iCapital® Acquires Hexure to Create the Industry’s First End-to-End Annuity and Insurance Technology Platform

iCapital® Acquires Hexure to Create the Industry’s First End-to-End Annuity and Insurance Technology Platform

The acquisition empowers financial advisors, distributors, and insurance carriers with a single integrated platform iCapital1, the global fintech company shaping
Share
Globalfintechseries2026/03/17 22:02
ADA Price Prediction: Here’s The Best Place To Make 50x Gains

ADA Price Prediction: Here’s The Best Place To Make 50x Gains

But while Cardano holds steady, Remittix is turning into the breakout story of 2025. Having raised over $25.9 million from […] The post ADA Price Prediction: Here’s The Best Place To Make 50x Gains appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 01:53
Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected

The post Fed forecasts only one rate cut in 2026, a more conservative outlook than expected appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell talks to reporters following the regular Federal Open Market Committee meetings at the Fed on July 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images The Federal Reserve is projecting only one rate cut in 2026, fewer than expected, according to its median projection. The central bank’s so-called dot plot, which shows 19 individual members’ expectations anonymously, indicated a median estimate of 3.4% for the federal funds rate at the end of 2026. That compares to a median estimate of 3.6% for the end of this year following two expected cuts on top of Wednesday’s reduction. A single quarter-point reduction next year is significantly more conservative than current market pricing. Traders are currently pricing in at two to three more rate cuts next year, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch tool, updated shortly after the decision. The gauge uses prices on 30-day fed funds futures contracts to determine market-implied odds for rate moves. Here are the Fed’s latest targets from 19 FOMC members, both voters and nonvoters: Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards The forecasts, however, showed a large difference of opinion with two voting members seeing as many as four cuts. Three officials penciled in three rate reductions next year. “Next year’s dot plot is a mosaic of different perspectives and is an accurate reflection of a confusing economic outlook, muddied by labor supply shifts, data measurement concerns, and government policy upheaval and uncertainty,” said Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management. The central bank has two policy meetings left for the year, one in October and one in December. Economic projections from the Fed saw slightly faster economic growth in 2026 than was projected in June, while the outlook for inflation was updated modestly higher for next year. There’s a lot of uncertainty…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:59